[Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[Sebastien COUPPEY]

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:43:09PM +0530, Anand Avati wrote:
> the article is right. AFR itself does intelligent failover. and you do not
> need a namespace unless you use unify.

So in this example, if brik1 is down the namespace is down and nothing
is available ?




> 
> avati
> 
> 2008/1/10, Sebastien COUPPEY <sebastien.couppey at zero9.it>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Understanding_AFR_Translator
> >
> > the cluster example starting at :  Clustered Mode
> > does't seems to me to be redundant as if the brick1 goes down, the
> > namespace is not available anymore and the files are also not
> > available anymore.
> >
> > Am I wrong ?
> >
> > Thanks
>