[Gluster-devel] latest patches?

[Sascha Ottolski]

Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 18:05:29 schrieben Sie:
> Sascha,
>  please roll back to patch-629. The self heal changes are half done. In the
> mean time, can you open the core with gdb :
>
> gdb -c /core.PID glusterfs
>
> and at the gdb prompt:
>
> (gdb) bt
>
> and give us this output. it will be of great help.
> avati

here your go; hmm, doesn't look very much different to what was in the 
logfile:

Core was generated by 
`[glusterfs]                                                             '.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x00002aaaaaab2dec in client_protocol_xfer ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00002aaaaaab2dec in client_protocol_xfer ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so
#1  0x00002aaaaabc4499 in afr_setdents ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so
#2  0x00002aaaaace3d7b in unify_sh_ns_getdents_cbk ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/unify.so
#3  0x00002aaaaabc4c4b in afr_getdents_cbk ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so
#4  0x00002aaaaaab0db3 in fini ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so
#5  0x00002aaaaaab196c in notify ()
   from /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so
#6  0x00002b1218a565df in sys_epoll_iteration ()
   from /usr/lib/libglusterfs.so.0
#7  0x00002b1218a55a75 in poll_iteration () from /usr/lib/libglusterfs.so.0
#8  0x000000000040338d in main ()
(gdb) 


Cheers, Sascha

>
> 2008/1/7, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski at web.de>:
> > Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 17:39:15 schrieben Sie:
> > > Sascha,
> > >  these patches are still not final (self heal enhancements are on the
> >
> > way)
> >
> > > but, as-is they should be stable.
> >
> > thanks, but I think there is a problem :-( just gave'em a whirl, but the
> > client would segfault on first acces of the mount point:
> >
> > ---------
> > got signal (11), printing backtrace
> > ---------
> > /lib/libc.so.6[0x2b15ff9f9110]
> > /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so[0x2aaaaaab2dec]
> > /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so(afr_setdents+0x1b9)
> > [0x2aaaaabc4499]
> >
> > /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/unify.so(unify_sh_ns_getdents_cbk
> >+0x15b) [0x2aaaaace3d7b]
> > /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so(afr_getdents_cbk+0x20b)
> > [0x2aaaaabc4c4b]
> > /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so[0x2aaaaaab0db3]
> > /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so(notify+0x8fc)
> > [0x2aaaaaab196c]
> > /usr/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(sys_epoll_iteration+0xbf)[0x2b15ff47c5df]
> > /usr/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(poll_iteration+0x75)[0x2b15ff47ba75]
> > glusterfs(main+0x39d)[0x40338d]
> > /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xda)[0x2b15ff9e64ca]
> > glusterfs[0x402f5a]
> >
> >
> > Let me know if I can help tracking it down.
> >
> >
> > Cheers, Sascha
> >
> > > avati
> > >
> > > 2008/1/7, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski at web.de>:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > does anyone know if the patches 629 till 633 can be considered
> > > > stable? they
> > > > sound as if they could increase performance, is this the case?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > >
> > > > Sascha
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel