[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS unify mountpoint, if one of the bricks offline

[Anand Avati]

Andrey,
 which revision of glusterfs are you using?

avati

2008/2/29, NovA <av.nova at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm testing GlusterFS unify behaviour in case of failure of a brick.
> My GlusterFS unify combines 23 bricks and is mounted at /home. Each
> brick has posix->locks->threads xlators; unifying client has
> nufa->threads->write_behind xlators.
>
> So, I started copying of some 20GB file to /home/tmp/file.rar and then
> switched off one of the bricks (client #5-5 -> c55). The coping
> continues flawlessly, listing of /home subdirs works fine, but "ls
> /home" results in "Transport endpoint is not connected" and the
> /var/log/glusterfs/client.log has the following errors:
> ---
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 E [fuse-bridge.c:436:fuse_entry_cbk]
> glusterfs-fuse: 264935: / => -1 (116)
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 E [tcp-client.c:190:tcp_connect] c55: non-blocking
> connect() returned: 113 (No r
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 W [client-protocol.c:349:client_protocol_xfer]
> c55: not connected at the moment
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 E [fuse-bridge.c:436:fuse_entry_cbk]
> glusterfs-fuse: 264936: / => -1 (116)
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 W [client-protocol.c:349:client_protocol_xfer]
> c55: not connected at the moment
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 W [client-protocol.c:349:client_protocol_xfer]
> c55: not connected at the moment
> 2008-02-29 12:52:48 E [fuse-bridge.c:675:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> 264938: / => -1 (107)
> ---
>
> Is this expected behaviour? I thought, that when a brick is switched
> off, some files in unify FS will temporary disappear, but all
> directory tree should remain valid.
>
> With best regards,
>   Andrey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
If I traveled to the end of the rainbow
As Dame Fortune did intend,
Murphy would be there to tell me
The pot's at the other end.