[Gluster-devel] FUSE 2.7.3?

[Amar S. Tumballi]

Thanks for reminding me :)

I have the fuse 2.7.3 tarball with GlusterFS patch here.

http://ftp.zresearch.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/fuse/pre/fuse-2.7.3glfs10.tar.gz
Patch applied is
http://ftp.zresearch.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/fuse/pre/fuse2.7.3glfs10.patch.txt

Marian,
 Sorry, I already did it :-)

Brent,
 If your rm -rf over NFS re-export works fine, let us know.

Regards,
Amar

PS: I have currently kept it under as pre release, as we haven't ran enough
testing on it. But as its the same patch applied on 2.7.2glfs9, which was
working fine for all this time, I assume there should not be any problems.
Once we test it enough (say minimum 15days under load), we will put it at
top level directory for fuse release.


On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Brent A Nelson <brent at phys.ufl.edu> wrote:

> Thanks, but it looks like I might as well stick with 2.7.2.  The patch is
> actually for their fusexmp_fh.c example file, so the fix actually needs to
> be made in all the client codes out there...
>
> On that note, GlusterFS dudes, could you please take a look at the small
> patch at:
> http://fuse.cvs.sourceforge.net/fuse/fuse/example/fusexmp_fh.c?r1=1.25&r2=1.26&view=patchand adjust the GlusterFS client code, accordingly? This should hopefully
> eliminate the last known glitch with unfs3 reexport, which is that rm -rf
> often doesn't work fully.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Marian Marinov wrote:
>
>  I don't know if anyone of the ZResearch team has made a patch for fuse
> > 2.7.3
> > but I'm sure that we don't have GlusterFUSE for 2.7.3.
> >
> > Actually if you are interested in testing I could have a patch working
> > by
> > Thursday.
> >
> > Regards
> >  Marian
> >
> > On Monday 21 April 2008 22:13:53 Brent A Nelson wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone tried GlusterFS with FUSE 2.7.3, yet? It has a
> > > seekdir-related
> > > patch needed for reliable rm -rf support via NFS, apparently.
> > >
> > > Would 2.7.3 still benefit from the glfs9 patch, and has anyone tried
> > > porting the patch (or maybe it just works without modification)?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Brent
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!