[Gluster-devel] Duplicate Symlinks in ls

[Erik Osterman]

nm, I understand now what you mean by the empty export directory. I'll 
try and reconcile the file differences with rsync and start with a fresh 
export directory.

Thanks,

Erik


Erik Osterman wrote:
> Yikes, I didn't realize that files must be unique per subvolume of a 
> unify translator. Guess I need to gc my glusterfs now. Hrm...
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Is this a feature to be addressed in 1.4 with the f* stuff?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Erik
>
>
> Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
>> Erik,
>>  Yes, AFR replicates all the files (symlinks too) on its child nodes, 
>> but UNIFY requires the file (not directories) on only one of the 
>> child node.
>>
>> Thus, as of now (with this release) when one is changing 
>> configuration related to xlators/cluster/{afr,stripe,unify} the empty 
>> export directory is recommended to avoid inconsistancy.
>>
>> -amar
>> (bulde on #gluster)
>>
>> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:10:33AM -0700, Erik Osterman wrote:
>>  
>>> Yes, the configuration prior to this had only 1 AFR layer with all 4 
>>> volumes inside of it. I had a problem getting uniform distribution 
>>> of files between the glusterfsd servers and got some help from bulde 
>>> on #gluster who showed me how to do it correctly.
>>>
>>> Is that the cause?
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>>
>>> Anand Avati wrote:
>>>    
>>>> were the files in this created *after* coming to this configuration?
>>>> or were the files already created with a different configuration and
>>>> later on reconfigured?
>>>>
>>>> avati
>>>>
>>>> On 5/4/07, Erik Osterman <e at osterman.com> wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> ### Server
>>>>>
>>>>> volume ourcompany
>>>>>  type storage/posix
>>>>>  option directory /home/glusterfs/ourcompany.com
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume server
>>>>>  type protocol/server
>>>>>  subvolumes ourcompany
>>>>>  option transport-type tcp/server
>>>>>  option bind-address 0.0.0.0
>>>>>  option listen-port 6996
>>>>>  option client-volume-filename /etc/glusterfs/ourcompany-client.vol
>>>>>  option auth.ip.ourcompany.allow *
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> ### Client
>>>>> volume ip0
>>>>>  type protocol/client
>>>>>  option transport-type tcp/client
>>>>>  option remote-host 1.2.3.23
>>>>>  option remote-port 6996
>>>>>  option remote-subvolume ourcompany
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume ip1
>>>>>  type protocol/client
>>>>>  option transport-type tcp/client
>>>>>  option remote-host 1.2.3.24
>>>>>  option remote-port 6996
>>>>>  option remote-subvolume ourcompany
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume ip2
>>>>>  type protocol/client
>>>>>  option transport-type tcp/client
>>>>>  option remote-host 1.2.3.25
>>>>>  option remote-port 6996
>>>>>  option remote-subvolume ourcompany
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume ip3
>>>>>  type protocol/client
>>>>>  option transport-type tcp/client
>>>>>  option remote-host 1.2.3.26
>>>>>  option remote-port 6996
>>>>>  option remote-subvolume ourcompany
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume afr1
>>>>>  type cluster/afr
>>>>>  subvolumes ip0 ip1
>>>>>  option replicate *:2                 # All files 2 copies (RAID-1)
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume afr2
>>>>>  type cluster/afr
>>>>>  subvolumes ip2 ip3
>>>>>  option replicate *:2                 # All files 2 copies (RAID-1)
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>> volume ip
>>>>>  type cluster/unify
>>>>>  subvolumes afr1 afr2
>>>>>  option scheduler rr
>>>>>  option rr.limits.min-free-disk 2GB
>>>>> end-volume
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anand Avati wrote:
>>>>>        
>>>>>> can you please post your client and server spec file too?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> avati
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/4/07, Erik Osterman <e at osterman.com> wrote:
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>> We are running the latest TLA as of around May 2, 3pm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 daemon      ourproduct   12 2007-04-30 13:43 
>>>>>>> shared ->
>>>>>>> /mnt/shared/
>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 daemon      ourproduct   12 2007-04-30 13:43 
>>>>>>> shared ->
>>>>>>> /mnt/shared/
>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 ourproduct  ourproduct    1 2007-04-30 13:43 
>>>>>>> ourproduct
>>>>>>> -> .
>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 ourproduct  ourproduct    1 2007-04-30 13:43 
>>>>>>> ourproduct
>>>>>>> -> .
>>>>>>> drwx------  2 ourproduct  ourproduct 4096 2006-10-24 23:24 .ssh
>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  3 ourproduct  ourproduct 4096 2006-05-17 02:39 
>>>>>>>             
>>>>> .subversion
>>>>>        
>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 bin         ourproduct    8 2007-04-30 13:43 trunk ->
>>>>>>> 1.0.0037
>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 bin         ourproduct    8 2007-04-30 13:43 trunk ->
>>>>>>> 1.0.0037
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not causing any problems for us, just through I'd bring it up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Erik Osterman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>           
>>>>>         
>>>>       
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>>     
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel