[Gluster-devel] memory usage (client) (not fixed?)

Anand Avati avati at zresearch.com
Thu Jul 19 20:34:38 UTC 2007


Dale,
please update to patch-320+, it should be a great deal lighter on memory
usage.

thanks,
avati


2007/7/7, Dale Dude <dale at oc3networks.com>:
>
> Im using patch 283 and think there might still be an issue. On 2 boxes
> with same os (2.6.15), fuse (2.6.5) and glusterfs they maintain memory
> after an rsync. After hours of inactivity it hasnt gone down.
>
> Box1: 341megz (5tb of files but transfer maybe a couple megs)
> Box2: 800megz (2tb of files and transfers almost a gig)
>
> Dale
>
>
> Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
> > I'd like to say that the memory leak in unify has been plugged in
> > patch-277.
> > Thanks, Amar and crew!
> >
> > My current "top", after several hours of non-stop usage:
> >
> >  6125 root      16   0  230m 157m  908 S   23  7.8  41:51.75 [glusterfs]
> >
> > It's been stable like that for a long time now. The current amount can
> > easily be explained by io-threads, read-ahead and write-behind caches.
> >
> > I'm moving on to tweaking for performance, as glusterfs is now stable
> > enough for me to use it in production.
> >
> > Once again, a big thanks to the dev team :)
> >
> > Rhesa
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Anand V. Avati



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list