[Gluster-devel] no element to prune

[Amar S. Tumballi]

Hi,
 These messages (no element to prune) are just debug messages, no need to be
worried about them. In the stable code base, we will remove all these
confusing/unneccessary debug log messages. Till then you may expect your log
file to grow *very* large with -LDEBUG flag.

-amar

On 7/11/07, Pooya Woodcock <pooya at packetcloud.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone, been a while since I last posted since I've been running
> very table in the 2.4 branch. Just recently I took the plunge--- I am
> running mainline 2.5 latest TLA as for an hour ago (294?)
>
> 2007-07-10 12:01:11 D [inode.c:332:__passive_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> passivating inode(34735742), lru=56/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:01:11 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:11 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:11 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:11 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:11 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [inode.c:302:__active_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> activating inode(34685086), lru=55/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [inode.c:332:__passive_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> passivating inode(34685086), lru=56/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [inode.c:302:__active_inode] brick/inode:
> activating inode(11862174), lru=55/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [inode.c:332:__passive_inode] brick/inode:
> passivating inode(11862174), lru=56/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:01:12 D [inode.c:302:__active_inode] brick/inode:
> activating inode(11912029), lru=55/1000
>
> There are lots of "no element to prune"s on my daemon log files.
> Should I worry about this?
>
> [root at node04 ~]# tail /var/log/glusterfsd.log
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [inode.c:332:__passive_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> passivating inode(10552395), lru=57/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [inode.c:302:__active_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> activating inode(10552395), lru=56/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [inode.c:302:__active_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> activating inode(10552520), lru=55/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks-afr: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [inode.c:332:__passive_inode] brick-afr/inode:
> passivating inode(10552520), lru=56/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [inode.c:302:__active_inode] brick/inode:
> activating inode(12141234), lru=56/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks: no element to prune
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [inode.c:332:__passive_inode] brick/inode:
> passivating inode(12141234), lru=57/1000
> 2007-07-10 12:03:45 D [server-protocol.c:639:server_inode_prune]
> locks: no element to prune
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
http://amar.80x25.org
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]