[Cinder.glusterfs.ci] [Third-party-announce] FW: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn off CI System

John Griffith john.griffith8 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 16 15:36:52 UTC 2015


On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Sasikanth Eda <sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Ramy, I will stick to ci-sandbox and resolve the issues.
> yes, I am currently reusing nodes and working towards nodepool.
>
> Regards,
> Sasi
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for "Asselin, Ramy" ---15-06-2015 PM
> 11:06:42---HI Sasi, I’m ok with re-enabling the account because it]"Asselin,
> Ramy" ---15-06-2015 PM 11:06:42---HI Sasi, I’m ok with re-enabling the
> account because it seems you have it under control now. However
>
> From: "Asselin, Ramy" <ramy.asselin at hp.com>
> To: Sasikanth Eda/India/IBM at IBMIN
> Cc: Ashutosh Mate/India/IBM at IBMIN, Bill Owen <billowen at us.ibm.com>, Jay S
> Bryant <jsbryant at us.ibm.com>, Nilesh P Bhosale/India/IBM at IBMIN, Sandeep
> Ramesh/India/IBM at IBMIN, "Announcements for third party CI operators." <
> third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 15-06-2015 PM 11:06
> Subject: RE: [Third-party-announce] FW: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn
> off CI System
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> HI Sasi,
>
> *I’m ok with re-enabling the account because it seems you have it under
> control now. However, please stick to the ci-sandbox until you have the
> other issues resolved (see below).*
>
> last 10 comments from 'Sasikanth Eda' on project 'openstack-dev/ci-sandbox'
> [0] 2015-06-15 06:55:58 (9:25:41 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/170143*
> <https://review.openstack.org/170143> 'NexentaCI test changeset'
> message: "Patch Set 93: Verified+1
>
> Build succeeded. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck ibmgpfs.
>
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/43/170143/93/check/dsvm-tempest-full/63277f1*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/43/170143/93/check/dsvm-tempest-full/63277f1> :
> SUCCESS in 29m 44s"
>
> [1] 2015-06-14 07:34:08 (1 day, 8:47:31 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/191548*
> <https://review.openstack.org/191548> 'Testing-5'
> message: "Patch Set 1: Verified+1
>
> Build succeeded. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck ibmgpfs.
>
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/48/191548/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/4cd03e5*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/48/191548/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/4cd03e5> :
> SUCCESS in 30m 46s"
>
> [2] 2015-06-14 06:57:03 (1 day, 9:24:36 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/191547*
> <https://review.openstack.org/191547> 'Testing-5'
> message: "Patch Set 1: Verified+1
>
> Build succeeded. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck ibmgpfs.
>
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/47/191547/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/ec6807a*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/47/191547/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/ec6807a> :
> SUCCESS in 31m 57s"
>
> [3] 2015-06-14 06:14:53 (1 day, 10:06:46 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/191545*
> <https://review.openstack.org/191545> 'Testing-4'
> message: "Patch Set 1: Verified+1
>
> Build succeeded. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck ibmgpfs.
>
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/45/191545/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/441a0a9*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/45/191545/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/441a0a9> :
> SUCCESS in 31m 28s"
>
>
> *Are you reusing nodes? This doesn’t look right:*
>
>
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/45/191545/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/441a0a9/logs/etc/cinder/*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/ibmgpfsci/45/191545/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/441a0a9/logs/etc/cinder/>
>
> [image: cid:image001.png at 01D0A74C.94840EE0]
>
> Ramy
>
> *From:* Sasikanth Eda [*mailto:sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com*
> <sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com>]
> * Sent:* Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:36 AM
> * To:* Asselin, Ramy
> * Cc:* Ashutosh Mate; Bill Owen; Jay S Bryant; Nilesh P Bhosale; Sandeep
> Ramesh; Announcements for third party CI operators.
> * Subject:* Re: [Third-party-announce] FW: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED:
> Turn off CI System
>
>
> Hi Ramy,
>
> Thanks for cooperation and help.
>
> ibm-gpfs-ci setup is operational and started posted using my personal
> (Sasikanth) account.
> Request your help in looking to below commits and help recommend to enable
> "ibm-gpfs-ci" account (registered with email - *rsandeep at in.ibm.com*
> <rsandeep at in.ibm.com>).
>
> [1]* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191545/*
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191545/>
> [2] *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191547/*
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191547/>
> [3] *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191548/*
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191548/>
>
> Regards,
> Sasi
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for "Asselin, Ramy" ---05-06-2015 PM
> 08:45:37---Jay, Sasi can use his personal gerrit account for CI work]"Asselin,
> Ramy" ---05-06-2015 PM 08:45:37---Jay, Sasi can use his personal gerrit
> account for CI work to keep testing in ‘silent mode’. Once his
>
> From: "Asselin, Ramy" <*ramy.asselin at hp.com* <ramy.asselin at hp.com>>
> To: Jay S Bryant <*jsbryant at us.ibm.com* <jsbryant at us.ibm.com>>
> Cc: "Announcements for third party CI operators." <
> *third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org*
> <third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org>>, Bill Owen <
> *billowen at us.ibm.com* <billowen at us.ibm.com>>, Sandeep
> Ramesh/India/IBM at IBMIN, Sasikanth Eda/India/IBM at IBMIN, Ashutosh
> Mate/India/IBM at IBMIN, Nilesh P Bhosale/India/IBM at IBMIN
> Date: 05-06-2015 PM 08:45
> Subject: Re: [Third-party-announce] FW: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn
> off CI System
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Jay,
>
> Sasi can use his personal gerrit account for CI work to keep testing in
> ‘silent mode’. Once his tests are passing, he can send me a link to the
> public logs. After I verify that it is working, I can recommend his account
> to be re-enabled.
>
> Ramy
>
> * From:* Jay S Bryant [*mailto:jsbryant at us.ibm.com* <jsbryant at us.ibm.com>]
>
> * Sent:* Friday, June 05, 2015 8:03 AM
> * To:* Asselin, Ramy
> * Cc:* Ashutosh Mate; Bill Owen; Nilesh P Bhosale; Sandeep Ramesh;
> Sasikanth Eda; Announcements for third party CI operators.
> * Subject:* Re: FW: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn off CI System
>
>
> Ramy,
>
> I spoke with Sasi this morning and he has been working on the 3rd Party CI
> system for GPFS.  He has gotten the initial problems addressed and now
> needs our CI account re-enabled so that he can do testing against the
> ci-sandbox.
>
> Can you please re-enable the *rsandeep at in.ibm.com* <rsandeep at in.ibm.com> account
> for ibm-gpfs-ci ?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> * Jay S. Bryant*
>      *IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert  &  Cinder Core Member*
>
> Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN
> Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410
> TIE Line: 553-4270
> E-Mail:  *jsbryant at us.ibm.com* <jsbryant at us.ibm.com>
> IRC Nickname: jungleboyj
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed.
>                 -- Sean O'Casey
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for "Asselin, Ramy" ---06/03/2015 10:06:14
> PM---Hi, I am requesting this CI system to be disabled. It is]"Asselin,
> Ramy" ---06/03/2015 10:06:14 PM---Hi, I am requesting this CI system to be
> disabled. It is still posting noise even after responding s
>
> From: "Asselin, Ramy" <*ramy.asselin at hp.com* <ramy.asselin at hp.com>>
> To: "Announcements for third party CI operators." <
> *third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org*
> <third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org>>
> Cc: Sasikanth Eda <*sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com* <sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com>>,
> Ashutosh Mate <*ashumate at in.ibm.com* <ashumate at in.ibm.com>>, Bill
> Owen/Tucson/IBM at IBMUS, Nilesh P Bhosale <*nilesh.bhosale at in.ibm.com*
> <nilesh.bhosale at in.ibm.com>>, Sandeep Ramesh <*sandeep.patil at in.ibm.com*
> <sandeep.patil at in.ibm.com>>, Jay S Bryant/Rochester/IBM at IBMUS
> Date: 06/03/2015 10:06 PM
> Subject: FW: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn off CI System
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am requesting this CI system to be disabled. It is still posting noise
> even after responding saying it was disabled.
>
> e.g. *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188240/*
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188240/>
> IBM GPFS CI check           Jun 3, 2015 7:44 PM
> noop-check-communication         SUCCESS in 0s
> dsvm-tempest-full            NOT_REGISTERED
>
> Sasikanth, you can request to be re-enabled after it is working correctly.
>
> Thanks,
> Ramy
>
> * From:* Asselin, Ramy
> * Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 7:55 PM
> * To:* 'Sasikanth Eda'
> * Cc:* Arati Ranade; Ashutosh Mate; Bill Owen; Nilesh P Bhosale; Sandeep
> Ramesh; Jay S Bryant
> * Subject:* RE: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn off CI System
> * Importance:* High
>
> HI Saikanth,
>
> Unfortunately, I don’t see your CI turned off. I will be requesting it to
> be disabled.
>
> IBM GPFS CI check           Jun 3, 2015 7:44 PM
> noop-check-communication         SUCCESS in 0s
> dsvm-tempest-full            NOT_REGISTERED
>
> Ramy
>
> * From:* Sasikanth Eda [*mailto:sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com*
> <sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com>]
> * Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 3:26 AM
> * To:* Asselin, Ramy
> * Cc:* Arati Ranade; Ashutosh Mate; Bill Owen; Nilesh P Bhosale; Sandeep
> Ramesh; Jay S Bryant
> * Subject:* Re: Fw: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn off CI System
>
>
> Hi Ramy,
>
> Thanks for offering your helping hand and it is pleasure interacting with
> you (We had an interaction long back at the initial CI days, in-fact we are
> using your os-ext-testing repo).
>
> Sorry for the noise created. We have disabled CI and actively working on
> restoring it back.
>
> Request your kind help on this (I will ping you for further help). We will
> try the best and get it ready by / in next week.
>
> Regards,
> Sasi
>
> ----- Forwarded by Sandeep Ramesh/India/IBM on 06/03/2015 11:49 AM -----
>
> From: "Asselin, Ramy" <*ramy.asselin at hp.com* <ramy.asselin at hp.com>>
> To: Sandeep Ramesh/India/IBM at IBMIN
> Date: 06/02/2015 11:58 PM
> Subject: URGENT ACTION REQUIRED: Turn off CI System
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You ci system is not providing any useful data.
>
> There’s no need to create noise on every cinder patch:
>
> IBM GPFS CI check           Jun 1, 2015 7:55 AM
> noop-check-communication         SUCCESS in 0s
> dsvm-tempest-full            NOT_REGISTERED
>
> If you’re testing, please use this repo for testing:
> *http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/ci-sandbox/*
> <http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/ci-sandbox/>
>
> If you have any questions, let me know by e-mail or IRC in freenode
> #openstack-cinder or #openstack-infra: asselin
> I’m happy to help out.
>
> * Please do this within 24 hours*, and reply when you complete this.
> Otherwise I will request your account to be disabled.
>
> Thanks,
> Ramy
>
> * Your comment history in Cinder:*
>
> last 10 comments from 'IBM GPFS CI' on project 'openstack/cinder'
> [0] 2015-06-02 18:12:29 (0:11:23 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/177665*
> <https://review.openstack.org/177665> 'Adds FC and ISCSI Cinder drivers
> for DotHill Storage Arrays.'
> message: "Patch Set 7:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/177665/7/check/noop-check-communication/942cbcf*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/177665/7/check/noop-check-communication/942cbcf> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/177665/7/check/dsvm-tempest-full/ff641e2*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/177665/7/check/dsvm-tempest-full/ff641e2> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [1] 2015-06-02 18:04:16 (0:19:36 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187707*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187707> 'Adds FC and ISCSI Cinder drivers
> for HPMSA Storage Arrays.'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/07/187707/1/check/noop-check-communication/4dbb474*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/07/187707/1/check/noop-check-communication/4dbb474> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/07/187707/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/b6649c2*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/07/187707/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/b6649c2> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [2] 2015-06-02 17:50:59 (0:32:53 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/186605*
> <https://review.openstack.org/186605> 'Add Pure Storage FibreChannel
> driver'
> message: "Patch Set 3:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/05/186605/3/check/noop-check-communication/a37cd4a*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/05/186605/3/check/noop-check-communication/a37cd4a> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/05/186605/3/check/dsvm-tempest-full/6b94371*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/05/186605/3/check/dsvm-tempest-full/6b94371> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [3] 2015-06-02 17:07:19 (1:16:33 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187682*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187682> 'Fix assertRaisesRegexp deprecation
> warnings in UT'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/82/187682/1/check/noop-check-communication/07ae99e*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/82/187682/1/check/noop-check-communication/07ae99e> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/82/187682/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/5bd42ce*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/82/187682/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/5bd42ce> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [4] 2015-06-02 16:41:26 (1:42:26 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187670*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187670> 'Make c-vol appear down if driver
> is uninitialized'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/70/187670/1/check/noop-check-communication/23cc960*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/70/187670/1/check/noop-check-communication/23cc960> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/70/187670/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/b234a4e*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/70/187670/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/b234a4e> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [5] 2015-06-02 16:35:42 (1:48:10 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187667*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187667> 'Fix cinder concurrency issues on
> rtstool'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/67/187667/1/check/noop-check-communication/488fa49*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/67/187667/1/check/noop-check-communication/488fa49> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/67/187667/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/4bd0977*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/67/187667/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/4bd0977> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [6] 2015-06-02 16:35:20 (1:48:32 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187666*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187666> 'Create iSCSI lio portals with
> right IPs and port'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/66/187666/1/check/noop-check-communication/afeaa61*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/66/187666/1/check/noop-check-communication/afeaa61> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/66/187666/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/91d02da*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/66/187666/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/91d02da> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [7] 2015-06-02 16:35:00 (1:48:52 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187665*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187665> 'Follow i18n guidelines in LIO
> target'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/187665/1/check/noop-check-communication/17a4b6b*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/187665/1/check/noop-check-communication/17a4b6b> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/187665/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/742e586*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/65/187665/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/742e586> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [8] 2015-06-02 16:34:39 (1:49:13 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187664*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187664> 'Log command failure details before
> raising ISCSITargetDetachFailed'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/64/187664/1/check/noop-check-communication/5a0c667*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/64/187664/1/check/noop-check-communication/5a0c667> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/64/187664/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/388ea24*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/64/187664/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/388ea24> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"
>
> [9] 2015-06-02 16:34:19 (1:49:33 old)
> *https://review.openstack.org/187663*
> <https://review.openstack.org/187663> 'Targets test refactoring'
> message: "Patch Set 1:
>
> Build failure. For rechecking only on IBM GPFS CI, add a review comment
> with recheck-gpfs.
>
> - noop-check-communication
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/63/187663/1/check/noop-check-communication/2bb815f*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/63/187663/1/check/noop-check-communication/2bb815f> :
> SUCCESS in 0s
> - dsvm-tempest-full
> *http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/63/187663/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/7eeb67d*
> <http://dal05.objectstorage.softlayer.net/v1/AUTH_58396f85-2c60-47b9-aaf8-e03bc24a1a6f/gpfsci/63/187663/1/check/dsvm-tempest-full/7eeb67d> :
> NOT_REGISTERED"_______________________________________________
> Third-party-announce mailing list
> *Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org*
> <Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org>
> *http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce*
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Third-party-announce mailing list
> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
> Please attend the third party meetings:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting
>
> ​Just a simple request, in the future when these sorts of emails go out
for a CI system, can we try and put the name of the system in the subject
line?  I keep seeing this subject and thinking "uhoh, is my CI doing
something wrong that I don't know about".

Thanks,
John​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/cinder.glusterfs.ci/attachments/20150616/6fc322c8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/cinder.glusterfs.ci/attachments/20150616/6fc322c8/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 15386248.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 42412 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/cinder.glusterfs.ci/attachments/20150616/6fc322c8/attachment-0003.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Third-party-announce mailing list
Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
Please attend the third party meetings: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting


More information about the Cinder.glusterfs.ci mailing list