[Cinder.glusterfs.ci] [Third-party-announce] OpenStackCI2 at hds.com is disabled

Erlon Cruz sombrafam at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 15:39:10 UTC 2015


Hi Anita,

I think I knew what happened, we had a power failure this weekend, and the
VM that was running the Jenkins master for this CI was automatically
booted, if you see on the CI reports all of then where sent on 13/07.

Whats is there any criteria for removing CIs? I fell this removal was very
unfair. I have seen CIs reporting errors for weeks and then, only after
warnings to operators in this mailing list, they are removed. In our case,
it was less than 24h, we got no warnings and got this account disabled.
Today, we can't test the CI against the patch that entered (yesterday) and
will have to do all the process to get the account again. Is it possible to
re-enable the account so we can continue the process to test the patch that
should fix the problem?

Thanks,
Erlon

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info> wrote:

> On 07/14/2015 10:18 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote:
> > Hi Anita,
> >
> > There was a change in an external library (lockutils) that was causing
> the
> > patches run in our CI to fail. We have reported the problem[1],
> submitted a
> > fix[2], and shut down the CI while the fix wasn't merged.
>
> Okay well somehow you shut down your system but it was still leaving
> comments on gerrit patches. How did that happen?
>
> Thanks Erlon,
> Anita.
>
>
> > That was about 10
> > days ago, and the patch only landed yesterday. We will re-run the above
> > tests and submit the successful results.
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1470112
> > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197686/
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info>
> wrote:
> >
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199537/
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198853/
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193937/
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201241/
> >>
> >> This account is posting NOT_REGISTERED on patches.
> >>
> >> This is an indication that zuul (if you are using zuul) is unable to
> >> clearly communicate with Jenkins nodes. This is an internal error and
> >> has nothing to do with the patch.
> >>
> >> Please fix your system and post your incident report with details as a
> >> response.
> >>
> >> Please test your system on ci-sandbox after it is working again.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Anita.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Third-party-announce mailing list
> >> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
> >> Please attend the third party meetings:
> >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Third-party-announce mailing list
> > Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
> > Please attend the third party meetings:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Third-party-announce mailing list
> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
> Please attend the third party meetings:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/cinder.glusterfs.ci/attachments/20150714/35786c95/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Third-party-announce mailing list
Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
Please attend the third party meetings: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting


More information about the Cinder.glusterfs.ci mailing list