[Bugs] [Bug 1787994] New: [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in schedule_georep.py.in isn't clear.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787994

            Bug ID: 1787994
           Summary: [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in
                    schedule_georep.py.in isn't clear.
           Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
           Version: rhgs-3.5
          Hardware: x86_64
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: geo-replication
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
          Assignee: sunkumar at redhat.com
          Reporter: kiyer at redhat.com
        QA Contact: rhinduja at redhat.com
                CC: bugs at gluster.org, csaba at redhat.com,
                    khiremat at redhat.com, rhs-bugs at redhat.com,
                    sabose at redhat.com, storage-qa-internal at redhat.com
        Depends On: 1786276
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Red Hat



+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1786276 +++

Description of problem:
SLAVE positional argument doesn't provide a clear picture of what it is when
compared to mastervol and slavevol in schedule_georep.py.in. It would be better
if we change it to something like "Slave hostame (<username>@SLAVEHOST or
SLAVEHOST)"

Present:
----------
positional arguments:
  mastervol            Master Volume Name
  SLAVE                SLAVEHOST or root at SLAVEHOST or user at SLAVEHOST 
  slavevol             Slave Volume Name


Suggested:
-----------
positional arguments:
  mastervol            Master Volume Name
  SLAVE                Slave hostname (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST)
  slavevol             Slave Volume Name


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Whatever it the latest

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2019-12-24 07:38:05 UTC ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in
schedule_georep.py.in) posted (#1) for review on master by Kshithij Iyer

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2020-01-06 04:06:56 UTC ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23919 ([geo-rep] Improving help message in
schedule_georep.py.in) merged (#5) on master by Kshithij Iyer


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786276
[Bug 1786276] [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in
schedule_georep.py.in isn't clear.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.