[Gluster-devel] patch #10954

[Ravishankar N]

On 01/28/2016 12:50 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> Yes, that should be good. Better to have just one version of the routine. Also, I
> think Ravi found a bug in brick_up_status() [or the _1 version?].
http://review.gluster.org/12913 fixed it upstream already. It wasn't 
sent to 3.7.
I think the patch http://review.gluster.org/13276 in 3.7  probably 
hand-copied brick_up_status() from an earlier git HEAD


>   So, that should
> also be incorporated.
>
> You'll probably get a conflict during backport as the routine was hand copied.
>
>> >