[Gluster-devel] Tests failing on Fedora

[Atin Mukherjee]

On 01/12/2016 07:26 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> Here is the list of tests that fail on Fedora 23 machine for our master
> branch.
> Considering that most of them pass on upstream CentOS regression
> machines, it indicates that our tests are not portable enough. 
> 
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t                                
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 68 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  36, 68
> tests/basic/afr/split-brain-healing.t                                  
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 56 Failed: 9)
>   Failed tests:  18-26
> tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t                                            
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 89 Failed: 19)
>   Failed tests:  16, 19-20, 24-25, 28, 31, 34-35, 38, 44-45
>                 47, 51-53, 55, 60-61
> tests/basic/rpm.t                                                      
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 7 Failed: 0)
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 8 tests but ran 7.
> tests/basic/tier/bug-1214222-directories_missing_after_attach_tier.t    
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 19 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  17-18
> tests/basic/tier/record-metadata-heat.t                                
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  16
> tests/basic/tier/tier.t                                                
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 46 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  44
> tests/bugs/access-control/bug-958691.t                                  
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  12, 19
> tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1260185-donot-allow-detach-commit-unnecessarily.t  
Gaurav, can you take a look at this failure since you are the author of
this test?
>             (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  10
> tests/bugs/glusterfs-server/bug-904300.t                                
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 26 Failed: 4)
>   Failed tests:  11-12, 23-24
> tests/bugs/quota/afr-quota-xattr-mdata-heal.t                          
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 104 Failed: 26)
>   Failed tests:  39-40, 43-46, 48-49, 52-55, 63, 71-72, 75-78
>                 80-81, 84-87, 93
> tests/bugs/quota/bug-1049323.t                                          
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 14 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  12
> tests/bugs/quota/bug-1240991.t                                          
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 19 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  15-16
> tests/bugs/replicate/bug-921231.t                                      
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  11
> tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t                                            
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 67 Failed: 16)
>   Failed tests:  10-11, 21-22, 26-27, 30-31, 42-43, 48, 50
>                 62-65
> tests/features/ipc.t                                                    
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 6 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  6
> tests/features/ssl-ciphers.t                                            
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 78 Failed: 9)
>   Failed tests:  20, 24-25, 29-30, 37, 43, 51, 63
> tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t                                  
>                 (Wstat: 0 Tests: 58 Failed: 36)
>   Failed tests:  14-20, 22-25, 28-30, 32-40, 43-44, 46-52
>                 55-58
> tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t                                  
>                (Wstat: 0 Tests: 59 Failed: 37)
>   Failed tests:  14-21, 23-26, 29-31, 33-41, 44-45, 47-53
>                 56-59
> Files=459, Tests=12592, 10705 wallclock secs ( 5.75 usr  1.11 sys +
> 435.83 cusr 387.48 csys = 830.17 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> 
> 
> 
> We have a patch for one such test here http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13228/.
> I request developers to pick tests from their modules and debug the issues.
> It may very well be the case that the test passes in a Fedora machine
> configured in a particular way, if that is the case it would be good to
> document it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Raghavendra Talur
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>