<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Niels de Vos <span dir="ltr"><<a target="_blank" href="mailto:ndevos@redhat.com">ndevos@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><span class="gmail-">On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:<br>
> On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:<br>
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:<br>
> > > Hi Niels,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is runtime<br>
> > > dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other things then<br>
> > > we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work except<br>
> > > signing the webhook data).<br>
> > Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen<br>
> > problems...<br>
> ><br>
> > We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the<br>
> > packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in<br>
> > errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please confirm<br>
> > that there are no problems when the package is missing?<br>
> Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working on<br>
> the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from<br>
> dependency list now.<br>
><br>
> @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release?<br>
<br>
</span>Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release<br>
managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the<br>
packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the dependency.<br>
<br>
If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in<br>
3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We did have a dependency for the eventing integration feature slated for oVirt 4.2 on <span class="gmail-">BZ 1501864. We already missed the beta for oVirt 4.2, so if an update of RPMs is possible that would be ideal.<br><br></span> </div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<span class="gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Niels<br>
</font></span><div class="gmail-HOEnZb"><div class="gmail-h5"><br>
<br>
> > If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in<br>
> > the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for<br>
> > updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much<br>
> > wanted.<br>
> ><br>
> > Niels<br>
> ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:<br>
> > > > Hi Aravinda,<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I<br>
> > > > tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora<br>
> > > > is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,<br>
> > > > and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes<br>
> > > > and updates.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over<br>
> > > > python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Thanks,<br>
> > > > Niels<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:<br>
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, <a href="mailto:jenkins@build.gluster.org">jenkins@build.gluster.org</a> wrote:<br>
> > > > > > SRC: <a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz">https://build.gluster.org/job/<wbr>release-new/21/artifact/<wbr>glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz</a><br>
> > > > > > HASH: <a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum">https://build.gluster.org/job/<wbr>release-new/21/artifact/<wbr>glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum</a><br>
> > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > This release is made off jenkins-release-21<br>
> > > > > This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events<br>
> > > > > sub-package (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="https://review.gluster.org/18519">https://review.gluster.org/<wbr>18519</a>). There is no python-jwt<br>
> > > > > in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package<br>
> > > > > in the CentOS Storage SIG.<br>
> > > > ><br>
> > > > > Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be<br>
> > > > > included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt<br>
> > > > > longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should<br>
> > > > > ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.<br>
> > > > ><br>
> > > > > [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]<br>
> > > > ><br>
> > > > > Thanks,<br>
> > > > > Niels<br>
> > > > > ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> > > > > packaging mailing list<br>
> > > > > <a href="mailto:packaging@gluster.org">packaging@gluster.org</a><br>
> > > > > <a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging">http://lists.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/packaging</a><br>
> > ><br>
> > > --<br>
> > > regards<br>
> > > Aravinda VK<br>
> > ><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> regards<br>
> Aravinda VK<br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>