<div dir="ltr">Ravi,<div><br></div><div>thanks a million.</div><div>@Mohit, @Srijan please let me know if you need any additional information.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br>Marco</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 17:28, Ravishankar N <<a href="mailto:ravishankar@redhat.com">ravishankar@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi Marco,<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I haven't had any luck yet. Adding Mohit and Srijan who work in glusterd in case they have some inputs.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">-Ravi</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:31 PM Marco Fais <<a href="mailto:evilmf@gmail.com" target="_blank">evilmf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Ravi<div><br></div><div>just wondering if you have any further thoughts on this -- unfortunately it is something still very much affecting us at the moment.</div><div>I am trying to understand how to troubleshoot it further but haven't been able to make much progress...<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br></div><div>Marco</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 19:04, Marco Fais <<a href="mailto:evilmf@gmail.com" target="_blank">evilmf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><font face="monospace">Just to complete...</font><div><font face="monospace"><br></font></div><div><font face="monospace">from the FUSE mount log on server 2 I see the same errors as in glustershd.log on node 1:</font></div><div><font face="monospace"><br></font></div><div><font face="monospace">[2021-05-20 17:58:34.157971 +0000] I [MSGID: 114020] [client.c:2319:notify] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: parent translators are ready, attempting connect on transport [] <br></font></div><div><font face="monospace">[2021-05-20 17:58:34.160586 +0000] I [rpc-clnt.c:1968:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: changing port to 49170 (from 0)<br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.160608 +0000] I [socket.c:849:__socket_shutdown] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: intentional socket shutdown(20)<br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.161403 +0000] I [MSGID: 114046] [client-handshake.c:857:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-10: Connected, attached to remote volume [{conn-name=VM_Storage_1-client-10}, {remote_subvol=/bricks/vm_b3_vol/brick}] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.161513 +0000] I [MSGID: 108002] [afr-common.c:6435:afr_notify] 0-VM_Storage_1-replicate-3: Client-quorum is met <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.162043 +0000] I [MSGID: 114020] [client.c:2319:notify] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-13: parent translators are ready, attempting connect on transport [] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.162491 +0000] I [rpc-clnt.c:1968:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-12: changing port to 49170 (from 0)<br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.162507 +0000] I [socket.c:849:__socket_shutdown] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-12: intentional socket shutdown(26)<br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.163076 +0000] I [MSGID: 114057] [client-handshake.c:1128:select_server_supported_programs] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: Using Program [{Program-name=GlusterFS 4.x v1}, {Num=1298437}, {Version=400}] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.163339 +0000] W [MSGID: 114043] [client-handshake.c:727:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: failed to set the volume [{errno=2}, {error=No such file or directory}] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.163351 +0000] W [MSGID: 114007] [client-handshake.c:752:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: failed to get from reply dict [{process-uuid}, {errno=22}, {error=Invalid argument}] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.163360 +0000] E [MSGID: 114044] [client-handshake.c:757:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: SETVOLUME on remote-host failed [{remote-error=Brick not found}, {errno=2}, {error=No such file or directory}] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.163365 +0000] I [MSGID: 114051] [client-handshake.c:879:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: sending CHILD_CONNECTING event [] <br>[2021-05-20 17:58:34.163425 +0000] I [MSGID: 114018] [client.c:2229:client_rpc_notify] 0-VM_Storage_1-client-11: disconnected from client, process will keep trying to connect glusterd until brick's port is available [{conn-name=VM_Storage_1-client-11}]</font> <br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 18:54, Marco Fais <<a href="mailto:evilmf@gmail.com" target="_blank">evilmf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">HI Ravi,<div><br></div><div>thanks again for your help.</div><div><br></div><div>Here is the output of "cat graphs/active/VM_Storage_1-client-11/private" from the same node where glustershd is complaining:</div><div><br></div><div><font face="monospace">[xlator.protocol.client.VM_Storage_1-client-11.priv]<br>fd.0.remote_fd = 1<br>------ = ------<br>granted-posix-lock[0] = owner = 7904e87d91693fb7, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 100, fl_end = 100, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 100, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[1] = owner = 7904e87d91693fb7, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 101, fl_end = 101, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 101, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[2] = owner = 7904e87d91693fb7, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 103, fl_end = 103, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 103, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[3] = owner = 7904e87d91693fb7, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 201, fl_end = 201, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 201, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[4] = owner = 7904e87d91693fb7, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 203, fl_end = 203, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 203, l_len = 1<br>------ = ------<br>fd.1.remote_fd = 0<br>------ = ------<br>granted-posix-lock[0] = owner = b43238094746d9fe, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 100, fl_end = 100, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 100, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[1] = owner = b43238094746d9fe, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 201, fl_end = 201, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 201, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[2] = owner = b43238094746d9fe, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 203, fl_end = 203, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 203, l_len = 1<br>------ = ------<br>fd.2.remote_fd = 3<br>------ = ------<br>granted-posix-lock[0] = owner = 53526588c515153b, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 100, fl_end = 100, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 100, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[1] = owner = 53526588c515153b, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 201, fl_end = 201, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 201, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[2] = owner = 53526588c515153b, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 203, fl_end = 203, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 203, l_len = 1<br>------ = ------<br>fd.3.remote_fd = 2<br>------ = ------<br>granted-posix-lock[0] = owner = 889461581e4fda22, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 100, fl_end = 100, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 100, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[1] = owner = 889461581e4fda22, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 101, fl_end = 101, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 101, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[2] = owner = 889461581e4fda22, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 103, fl_end = 103, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 103, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[3] = owner = 889461581e4fda22, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 201, fl_end = 201, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 201, l_len = 1<br>granted-posix-lock[4] = owner = 889461581e4fda22, cmd = F_SETLK fl_type = F_RDLCK, fl_start = 203, fl_end = 203, user_flock: l_type = F_RDLCK, l_start = 203, l_len = 1<br>------ = ------<br>connected = 1<br>total_bytes_read = 6665235356<br>ping_timeout = 42<br>total_bytes_written = 4756303549<br>ping_msgs_sent = 3662<br>msgs_sent = 16786186</font><br></div></div><div><br></div><div>So they seem to be connected there.</div><div><b>However</b> -- they are not connected apparently in server 2 (where I have just re-mounted the volume):</div><div>[root@lab-cnvirt-h02 .meta]# cat graphs/active/VM_Storage_1-client-11/private <br>[xlator.protocol.client.VM_Storage_1-client-11.priv]<br><b>connected = 0</b><br>total_bytes_read = 50020<br>ping_timeout = 42<br>total_bytes_written = 84628<br>ping_msgs_sent = 0<br>msgs_sent = 0<br>[root@lab-cnvirt-h02 .meta]# cat graphs/active/VM_Storage_1-client-20/private <br>[xlator.protocol.client.VM_Storage_1-client-20.priv]<br><b>connected = 0</b><br>total_bytes_read = 53300<br>ping_timeout = 42<br>total_bytes_written = 90180<br>ping_msgs_sent = 0<br>msgs_sent = 0<br></div><div><br></div><div>The other bricks look connected...</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br>Marco</div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 14:02, Ravishankar N <<a href="mailto:ravishankar@redhat.com" target="_blank">ravishankar@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:small">Hi Marco,</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:02 PM Marco Fais <<a href="mailto:evilmf@gmail.com" target="_blank">evilmf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi Ravi,<div><br></div><div>thanks a million for your reply.</div><div><br></div><div>I have replicated the issue in my test cluster by bringing one of the nodes down, and then up again.</div><div>The glustershd process in the restarted node is now complaining about connectivity to two bricks in one of my volumes:</div><div><br></div><div>---</div><div><font face="monospace">[2021-05-19 14:05:14.462133 +0000] I [rpc-clnt.c:1968:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: changing port to <span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span>49170 (from 0)<br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.464971 +0000] I [MSGID: 114057] [client-handshake.c:1128:select_server_supported_programs] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: Using Program [{Program-name=GlusterFS 4.x v1}, {Num=1298437}, {Version=400}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.465209 +0000] W [MSGID: 114043] [client-handshake.c:727:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: failed to set the volume [{errno=2}, {error=No such file or directory}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.465236 +0000] W [MSGID: 114007] [client-handshake.c:752:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: failed to get from reply dict [{process-uuid}, {errno=22}, {error=Invalid argument}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.465248 +0000] E [MSGID: 114044] [client-handshake.c:757:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: SETVOLUME on remote-host failed [{remote-error=Brick not found}, {errno=2}, {error=No such file or directory}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.465256 +0000] I [MSGID: 114051] [client-handshake.c:879:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: sending CHILD_CONNECTING event [] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.465291 +0000] I [MSGID: 114018] [client.c:2229:client_rpc_notify] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-11: disconnected from client, process will keep trying to connect glusterd until brick's port is available [{conn-name=VM_Storage_1-client-11}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.473598 +0000] I [rpc-clnt.c:1968:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: changing port to <span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span>49173 (from 0)<br></font></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:small">The above logs indicate that shd is trying to connect to the bricks on ports <span class="gmail_default"></span>49170 and <span class="gmail_default"></span>49173 respectively, when it should have done so using 49172 and 49169 (as per the volume status and ps output). Shd gets the brick port numbers info from glusterd, so I'm not sure what is going on here. Do you have fuse mounts on this particular node? If you don't, you can mount it temporarily, then check if the connection to the bricks is successful from the .meta folder of the mount:</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">cd /path-to-fuse-mount</div><div style="font-size:small">cd .meta</div><div style="font-size:small">cat graphs/active/VM_Storage_1-client-11/private <br></div><div style="font-size:small">cat graphs/active/VM_Storage_1-client-20/private <br></div><div style="font-size:small">etc. and check if connected=1 or 0.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">I just wanted to see if it is only the shd or even the other clients are unable to connect to the bricks from this node. FWIW, I tried upgrading from 7.9 to 8.4 on a test machine and the shd was able to connect to the bricks just fine.</div><div style="font-size:small">Regards,</div><div style="font-size:small">Ravi</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="monospace">[2021-05-19 14:05:14.476543 +0000] I [MSGID: 114057] [client-handshake.c:1128:select_server_supported_programs] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: Using Program [{Program-name=GlusterFS 4.x v1}, {Num=1298437}, {Version=400}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.476764 +0000] W [MSGID: 114043] [client-handshake.c:727:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: failed to set the volume [{errno=2}, {error=No such file or directory}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.476785 +0000] W [MSGID: 114007] [client-handshake.c:752:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: failed to get from reply dict [{process-uuid}, {errno=22}, {error=Invalid argument}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.476799 +0000] E [MSGID: 114044] [client-handshake.c:757:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: SETVOLUME on remote-host failed [{remote-error=Brick not found}, {errno=2}, {error=No such file or directory}] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.476812 +0000] I [MSGID: 114051] [client-handshake.c:879:client_setvolume_cbk] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: sending CHILD_CONNECTING event [] <br>[2021-05-19 14:05:14.476849 +0000] I [MSGID: 114018] [client.c:2229:client_rpc_notify] 2-VM_Storage_1-client-20: disconnected from client, process will keep trying to connect glusterd until brick's port is available [{conn-name=VM_Storage_1-client-20}] </font><br></div></div></div></div><div>---</div><div><br></div><div>The two bricks are the following:</div><div><font face="monospace">
VM_Storage_1-client-20 --> Brick21: lab-cnvirt-h03-storage:/bricks/vm_b5_arb/brick (arbiter)<br></font></div><div><font face="monospace">VM_Storage_1-client-11 --> Brick12: lab-cnvirt-h03-storage:/bricks/vm_b3_arb/brick (arbiter)<br></font></div><div>(In this case it the issue is on two arbiter nodes, but it is not always the case)</div><div><br></div><div>The port information via "gluster volume status VM_Storage_1" on the affected node (same as the one running the glustershd reporting the issue) is:</div><div><font face="monospace">Brick lab-cnvirt-h03-storage:/bricks/vm_b5_arb/brick <b>49172 </b>0 Y 3978256</font><br></div><div><font face="monospace">Brick lab-cnvirt-h03-storage:/bricks/vm_b3_arb/brick <b>49169 </b>0 Y 3978224<br></font></div><div><br></div><div>This is aligned to the actual port of the process:</div><div><font face="monospace">root 3978256 1.5 0.0 1999568 30372 ? Ssl May18 15:56 /usr/sbin/glusterfsd -s lab-cnvirt-h03-storage --volfile-id VM_Storage_1.lab-cnvirt-h03-storage.bricks-vm_b5_arb-brick -p /var/run/gluster/vols/VM_Storage_1/lab-cnvirt-h03-storage-bricks-vm_b5_arb-brick.pid -S /var/run/gluster/2b1dd3ca06d39a59.socket --brick-name /bricks/vm_b5_arb/brick -l /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/bricks-vm_b5_arb-brick.log --xlator-option *-posix.glusterd-uuid=a2a62dd6-49b2-4eb6-a7e2-59c75723f5c7 --process-name brick --brick-port <b>49172 </b>--xlator-option VM_Storage_1-server.listen-port=<b>49172</b></font><br></div><div><font face="monospace">root 3978224 4.3 0.0 1867976 27928 ? Ssl May18 44:55 /usr/sbin/glusterfsd -s lab-cnvirt-h03-storage --volfile-id VM_Storage_1.lab-cnvirt-h03-storage.bricks-vm_b3_arb-brick -p /var/run/gluster/vols/VM_Storage_1/lab-cnvirt-h03-storage-bricks-vm_b3_arb-brick.pid -S /var/run/gluster/00d461b7d79badc9.socket --brick-name /bricks/vm_b3_arb/brick -l /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/bricks-vm_b3_arb-brick.log --xlator-option *-posix.glusterd-uuid=a2a62dd6-49b2-4eb6-a7e2-59c75723f5c7 --process-name brick --brick-port <b>49169 </b>--xlator-option VM_Storage_1-server.listen-port=<b>49169</b><br></font></div><div><br></div><div>So the issue seems to be specifically on glustershd, as the <b>glusterd process seems to be aware of the right port </b>(as it matches the real port, and the brick is indeed up according to the status).</div><div><br></div><div>I have then requested a statedump as you have suggested, and the bricks seem to be not connected:</div><div><br></div><div><font face="monospace">[xlator.protocol.client.VM_Storage_1-client-11.priv]<br><b>connected=0</b><br>total_bytes_read=341120<br>ping_timeout=42<br>total_bytes_written=594008<br>ping_msgs_sent=0<br>msgs_sent=0<br></font></div><div><font face="monospace"><br></font></div><div><font face="monospace">[xlator.protocol.client.VM_Storage_1-client-20.priv]<br><b>connected=0</b><br>total_bytes_read=341120<br>ping_timeout=42<br>total_bytes_written=594008<br>ping_msgs_sent=0<br>msgs_sent=0</font><br></div><div><br></div><div>The important other thing to notice is that normally the bricks that are not connecting are always in the same (remote) node... i.e. they are both in node 3 in this case. That seems to be always the case, I have not encountered a scenario where bricks from different nodes are reporting this issue (at least for the same volume).</div><div><br></div><div>Please let me know if you need any additional info.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Marco</div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:31, Ravishankar N <<a href="mailto:ravishankar@redhat.com" target="_blank">ravishankar@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:small"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:22 PM Marco Fais <<a href="mailto:evilmf@gmail.com" target="_blank">evilmf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I am having significant issues with glustershd with releases 8.4 and 9.1.</div><div><br></div><div>My oVirt clusters are using gluster storage backends, and were running fine with Gluster 7.x (shipped with earlier versions of oVirt Node 4.4.x). Recently the oVirt project moved to Gluster 8.4 for the nodes, and hence I have moved to this release when upgrading my clusters.</div><div><br></div><div>Since then I am having issues whenever one of the nodes is brought down; when the nodes come back up online the bricks are typically back up and working, but some (random) glustershd processes in the various nodes seem to have issues connecting to some of them.</div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">When the issue happens, can you check if the TCP port number of the brick (glusterfsd) processes displayed in `gluster volume status` matches with that of the actual port numbers observed (i.e. the --brick-port argument) when you run `ps aux | grep glusterfsd` ? If they don't match, then glusterd has incorrect brick port information in its memory and serving it to glustershd. Restarting glusterd instead of (killing the bricks + `volume start force`) should fix it, although we need to find why glusterd serves incorrect port numbers. </span></div><div><br></div><div>If they do match, then <span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">can you </span>take a statedump of glustershd to check that it is indeed disconnected from the bricks<span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">? You will need to verify that 'connected=1' in the statedump. See "Self-heal is stuck/ not getting completed." section in <a href="https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Troubleshooting/troubleshooting-afr/" target="_blank">https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Troubleshooting/troubleshooting-afr/</a>. Statedump can be taken by `kill -SIGUSR1 $pid-of-glustershd`. It will be generated in the /var/run/gluster/ directory.</span></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Ravi </span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>