<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><a href="https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/NFS-Ganesha%20GlusterFS%20Integration/">https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/NFS-Ganesha%20GlusterFS%20Integration/</a><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:08 AM Alex K <<a href="mailto:rightkicktech@gmail.com">rightkicktech@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div> <a href="https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/NFS-Ganesha%20GlusterFS%20Integration/">https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/NFS-Ganesha%20GlusterFS%20Integration/</a></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Reading the HA setup at the above link, it mentions the use of ganesha-ha.conf which incorporates some
HA_CLUSTER_NODES etc parameters. I do not see the reason to go like that since HA is managed from gluster already. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>gluster's HA is for gluster. </div><div><br></div><div>HA for nfs-ganesha is managed by pacemaker as mentioned in the doc you referenced. The two are unrelated.<br></div><div><br></div><div>storhaug is incomplete, but it works well enough for some people. YMMV.</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div><br></div><div>Kaleb</div></div></div>