<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:10 PM Erik Jacobson <<a href="mailto:erik.jacobson@hpe.com">erik.jacobson@hpe.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">It is inconvenient for us to use MTU 9K for our gluster servers for<br>
various reasons. We typically have bonded 10G interfaces.<br>
<br>
We use distribute/replicate and gluster NFS for compute nodes.<br>
<br>
My understanding is the negative to using 1500 MTU is just less<br>
efficient use of the network. Are there other concerns? We don't<br>
currently have network saturation problems.<br>
<br>
We are trying to make a decision on if we need to do a bunch of extra<br>
work to switch to 9K MTU and if it is worth the benefit.<br>
<br>
Does the community have any suggestions?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">No worries, 1500 MTU is fine.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Y.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Erik<br>
________<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Community Meeting Calendar:<br>
<br>
Schedule -<br>
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC<br>
Bridge: <a href="https://bluejeans.com/441850968" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bluejeans.com/441850968</a><br>
<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>