<html><head></head><body><div class="ydpbd25dd37yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:courier new, courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">It depends of your needs.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">The Gluster's inbuilt NFS server is no longer recommended.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I think you should try NFS Ganesha, which uses libgfapi communication channel.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">If your app can use libgfappi - you can try that approach.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Best Regards,</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Strahil Nikolov</div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="ydpa9cb3cbdyahoo_quoted_3846719364" class="ydpa9cb3cbdyahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
В четвъртък, 18 юли 2019 г., 11:06:00 ч. Гринуич+3, Sudheer Singh <sudsingh@cs.stonybrook.edu> написа:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="ydpa9cb3cbdyiv0189160436"><div dir="ltr">Hi ,<div><br></div><div>I was doing perf testing and found out fuse mount much slower than NFS mount. I was curious to know what community recommends, mount volumes as fuse or NFS?</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Sudheer</div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>Gluster-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>