<div dir="auto">Yes, this is my observation so far.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 9, 2017 13:32, "Gionatan Danti" <<a href="mailto:g.danti@assyoma.it">g.danti@assyoma.it</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Il 09-09-2017 09:09 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting<br>
yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to<br>
crash immediately (only one of three nodes were actually up). This<br>
definitely happened for the first time (only one node had been killed<br>
yesterday).<br>
<br>
Using FUSE seems to be OK with replica 3. So this can be gfapi related<br>
or maybe rather libvirt related.<br>
<br>
I tried ioengine=gfapi with fio and job survived reboot.<br>
<br>
<br>
-ps<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
So, to recap:<br>
- with gfapi, your VMs crashes/mount read-only with a single node failure;<br>
- with gpapi also, fio seems to have no problems;<br>
- with native FUSE client, both VMs and fio have no problems at all.<br>
<br>
Is it correct?<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Danti Gionatan<br>
Supporto Tecnico<br>
Assyoma S.r.l. - <a href="http://www.assyoma.it" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.assyoma.it</a><br>
email: <a href="mailto:g.danti@assyoma.it" target="_blank">g.danti@assyoma.it</a> - <a href="mailto:info@assyoma.it" target="_blank">info@assyoma.it</a><br>
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8<br>
</blockquote></div></div>