<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><br></div><div>8+2 and 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just suggestions.<br></div><div>You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Ashish<br></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Alastair Neil" <ajneil.tech@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"gluster-users" <gluster-users@gluster.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, May 5, 2017 2:23:32 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>[Gluster-users] disperse volume brick counts limits in RHES<br><div><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi<br><div><br></div></div>we are deploying a large (24node/45brick) cluster and noted that the RHES guidelines limit the number of data bricks in a disperse set to 8. Is there any reason for this. I am aware that you want this to be a power of 2, but as we have a large number of nodes we were planning on going with 16+3. Dropping to 8+2 or 8+3 will be a real waste for us.<br><div><br></div></div>Thanks, <br><div><br></div><br></div>Alastair<br><div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>Gluster-users mailing list<br>Gluster-users@gluster.org<br>http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>