<div dir="auto">Hi Amar, <div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Currently, we are running 40 node cluster and each node has 36*6TB(210TB).As of now we don't face any issue with read and write performance except folder listing and disk failure healing. Planning to start another cluster with 36*10TB(360)per node. What kind of problem will we face if we go with 36*10(360)per node. Planned 360TB per node is far from recommended 64TB. We are using Glusterfs with disperse volume for video archival. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards </div><div dir="auto">K. Mohamed Pakkeer </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 20-Apr-2017 9:00 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <<a href="mailto:atumball@redhat.com">atumball@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 11:07 PM, Peter B. <<a href="mailto:pb@das-werkstatt.com" target="_blank">pb@das-werkstatt.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
Could you tell me what the technically maximum limit of capacity of a<br>
GlusterFS storage is?<br>
I cannot find any official statement on this...<br>
<br>
Somewhere it says "several Petabytes", but that's a bit vague.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It is mostly vague because the total storage depends on 2 things, what is per node storage you can get, and then how many nodes you have in cluster?</div><div><br></div><div>It is scalable comfortably for 128nodes, and per node you can have 64TB drives, making it 8PB.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
I'd need it for arguing pro GlusterFS in comparison to other systems.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hope the above info helps you. Btw, we are targeting more scalability related improvements in Gluster 4.0, so it should be much larger number from next year.</div><div><br></div><div>-Amar</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
Thank you very much in advance,<br>
Peter B.<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div><div dir="ltr">-- <br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Amar Tumballi (amarts)<br></div></div></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br></blockquote></div></div>