<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 3 February 2017 at 11:09, Momonth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:momonth@gmail.com" target="_blank">momonth@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I ran some benchmarking on SSD enabled servers, 10Gb connected, see<br>
the file attached.<br>
<br>
I'm still looking at GlusterFS as a persistent storage for containers,<br>
and it's clear it's not going to compete with local file system<br>
performance.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well that's kind of a given, with the standard rep 3, you're doing a sort of RAID 5 across the network. However depending on your use case & setup, you <i>can</i> get performance boosts akin to RAID 10 setups, multiplied bu the number of nodes/bricks in the cluster.<br><br><a href="http://blog.gluster.org/category/performance/">http://blog.gluster.org/category/performance/</a><br><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws001/guided_trek/Performance_in_a_Gluster_Systemv6F.pdf">https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws001/guided_trek/Performance_in_a_Gluster_Systemv6F.pdf</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>I couldn't find the particular doc, but I've seen some ludicrous throughputs from configs using multiple nodes running SSDs in RAID 10 and peering over Infiband.<br><br></div><div>D</div></div><br></div></div>