[Gluster-users] Freezing during heal
Kevin Lemonnier
lemonnierk at ulrar.net
Mon Apr 25 12:01:09 UTC 2016
Hi,
So I'm trying that now.
I installed 3.7.11 on two nodes and put a few VMs on it, same config
as before but with 64MB shards and the heal algo to full. As expected,
if I poweroff one of the nodes, everything is dead, which is fine.
Now I'm adding a third node, a big heal was started after the add-brick
of everything (7000+ shards), and for now everything seems to be working
fine on the VMs. Last time I tried adding a brick, all those VM died for
the duration of the heal, so that's already pretty good.
I'm gonna let it finish to copy everything on the new nodes, then I'll try
to simulate nodes going down to see if my original problem of freezing and
low heal time is solved with this config.
For reference, here is the volume info, if someone sees something I should change :
Volume Name: gluster
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: e4f01509-beaf-447d-821f-957cc5c20c0a
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: ipvr2.client_name:/mnt/storage/gluster
Brick2: ipvr3.client_name:/mnt/storage/gluster
Brick3: ipvr50.client_name:/mnt/storage/gluster
Options Reconfigured:
cluster.quorum-type: auto
cluster.server-quorum-type: server
network.remote-dio: enable
cluster.eager-lock: enable
performance.quick-read: off
performance.read-ahead: off
performance.io-cache: off
performance.stat-prefetch: off
features.shard: on
features.shard-block-size: 64MB
cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
performance.readdir-ahead: on
It starts at 2 and jumps to 50 because the first server is doing something else for now,
and I use 50 to be the temporary third node. If everything goes well, I'll migrate the production
on the cluster, re-install the first server and do a replace-brick, which I hope will work just as well
as the add-brick I'm doing now. Last replace-brick also brought everything down, but I guess that was the
joy of 3.7.6 :).
Thanks !
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:17:05PM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk at ulrar.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I will try migrating to 3.7.10, is it considered stable yet ?
> >
>
> Oops, just realized 3.7.10 had a regression. Then 3.7.11 it is. :)
>
>
> > Should I change the self heal algorithm even if I move to 3.7.10, or is
> > that not necessary ?
> > Not sure what that change might do.
> >
>
> So the other algorithm is 'diff' which computes rolling checksum on chunks
> of the src(es) and sink(s), compares them and heals upon mismatch. This is
> known to consume lot of CPU. 'full' algo on the other hand simply copies
> the src into sink in chunks. With sharding, it shouldn't be all that bad
> copying a 256MB file (in your case) from src to sink. We've used double the
> block size and had no issues reported.
>
> So you could change self heal algo to full even in the upgraded cluster.
>
> -Krutika
>
>
> >
> > Anyway, I'll try to create a 3.7.10 cluster in the week end slowly move
> > the VMs on it then,
> > Thanks a lot for your help,
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:58:44PM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yeah, so the fuse mount log didn't convey much information.
> > >
> > > So one of the reasons heal may have taken so long (and also consumed
> > > resources) is because of a bug in self-heal where it would do heal from
> > > both source bricks in 3-way replication. With such a bug, heal would take
> > > twice the amount of time and consume resources both the times by the same
> > > amount.
> > >
> > > This issue is fixed at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14008/ and will be
> > > available in 3.7.12.
> > >
> > > The other thing you could do is to set cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm
> > to
> > > 'full', for better heal performance and more regulated resource
> > consumption
> > > by the same.
> > > #gluster volume set <VOL> cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm full
> > >
> > > As far as sharding is concerned, some critical caching issues were fixed
> > in
> > > 3.7.7 and 3.7.8.
> > > And my guess is that the vm crash/unbootable state could be because of
> > this
> > > issue, which exists in 3.7.6.
> > >
> > > 3.7.10 saw the introduction of throttled client side heals which also
> > moves
> > > such heals to the background, which is all the more helpful for
> > preventing
> > > starvation of vms during client heal.
> > >
> > > Considering these factors, I think it would be better if you upgraded
> > your
> > > machines to 3.7.10.
> > >
> > > Do let me know if migrating to 3.7.10 solves your issues.
> > >
> > > -Krutika
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk at ulrar.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, but as I was saying I don't believe KVM is using a mount point, I
> > > > think it uses
> > > > the API (
> > > >
> > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Libgfapi_with_qemu_libvirt
> > > > ).
> > > > Might be mistaken ofcourse. Proxmox does have a mountpoint for
> > > > conveniance, I'll attach those
> > > > logs, hoping they contain the informations you need. They do seem to
> > > > contain a lot of errors
> > > > for the 15.
> > > > For reference, there was a disconnect of the first brick (10.10.0.1) in
> > > > the morning and then a successfull
> > > > heal that caused about 40 minutes downtime of the VMs. Right after that
> > > > heal finished (if my memory is
> > > > correct it was about noon or close) the second brick (10.10.0.2)
> > rebooted,
> > > > and that's the one I disconnected
> > > > to prevent the heal from causing another downtime.
> > > > I reconnected it one at the end of the afternoon, hoping the heal
> > would go
> > > > well but everything went down
> > > > like in the morning so I disconnected it again, and waited 11pm
> > (23:00) to
> > > > reconnect it and let it finish.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your help,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:28:28PM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> > > > > Sorry, I was referring to the glusterfs client logs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Assuming you are using FUSE mount, your log file will be in
> > > > > /var/log/glusterfs/<hyphenated-mount-point-path>.log
> > > > >
> > > > > -Krutika
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <
> > lemonnierk at ulrar.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I believe Proxmox is just an interface to KVM that uses the lib,
> > so if
> > > > I'm
> > > > > > not mistaken there isn't client logs ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's not the first time I have the issue, it happens on every heal
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > 2 clusters I have.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I did let the heal finish that night and the VMs are working now,
> > but
> > > > it
> > > > > > is pretty scarry for future crashes or brick replacement.
> > > > > > Should I maybe lower the shard size ? Won't solve the fact that 2
> > > > bricks
> > > > > > on 3 aren't keeping the filesystem usable but might make the
> > healing
> > > > > > quicker right ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le 17 avril 2016 17:56:37 GMT+02:00, Krutika Dhananjay <
> > > > > > kdhananj at redhat.com> a écrit :
> > > > > > >Could you share the client logs and information about the approx
> > > > > > >time/day
> > > > > > >when you saw this issue?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-Krutika
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Kevin Lemonnier
> > > > > > ><lemonnierk at ulrar.net>
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> We have a small glusterFS 3.7.6 cluster with 3 nodes running
> > with
> > > > > > >proxmox
> > > > > > >> VM's on it. I did set up the different recommended option like
> > the
> > > > > > >virt
> > > > > > >> group, but
> > > > > > >> by hand since it's on debian. The shards are 256MB, if that
> > matters.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This morning the second node crashed, and as it came back up
> > started
> > > > > > >a
> > > > > > >> heal, but that basically froze all the VM's running on that
> > volume.
> > > > > > >Since
> > > > > > >> we really really
> > > > > > >> can't have 40 minutes down time in the middle of the day, I just
> > > > > > >removed
> > > > > > >> the node from the network and that stopped the heal, allowing
> > the
> > > > > > >VM's to
> > > > > > >> access
> > > > > > >> their disks again. The plan was to re-connecte the node in a
> > couple
> > > > > > >of
> > > > > > >> hours to let it heal at night.
> > > > > > >> But a VM crashed now, and it can't boot up again : seems to
> > freez
> > > > > > >trying
> > > > > > >> to access the disks.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Looking at the heal info for the volume, it has gone way up
> > since
> > > > > > >this
> > > > > > >> morning, it looks like the VM's aren't writing to both nodes,
> > just
> > > > > > >the one
> > > > > > >> they are on.
> > > > > > >> It seems pretty bad, we have 2 nodes on 3 up, I would expect the
> > > > > > >volume to
> > > > > > >> work just fine since it has quorum. What am I missing ?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> It is still too early to start the heal, is there a way to
> > start the
> > > > > > >VM
> > > > > > >> anyway right now ? I mean, it was running a moment ago so the
> > data
> > > > is
> > > > > > >> there, it just needs
> > > > > > >> to let the VM access it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Volume Name: vm-storage
> > > > > > >> Type: Replicate
> > > > > > >> Volume ID: a5b19324-f032-4136-aaac-5e9a4c88aaef
> > > > > > >> Status: Started
> > > > > > >> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
> > > > > > >> Transport-type: tcp
> > > > > > >> Bricks:
> > > > > > >> Brick1: first_node:/mnt/vg1-storage
> > > > > > >> Brick2: second_node:/mnt/vg1-storage
> > > > > > >> Brick3: third_node:/mnt/vg1-storage
> > > > > > >> Options Reconfigured:
> > > > > > >> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> > > > > > >> cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> > > > > > >> network.remote-dio: enable
> > > > > > >> cluster.eager-lock: enable
> > > > > > >> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> > > > > > >> performance.quick-read: off
> > > > > > >> performance.read-ahead: off
> > > > > > >> performance.io-cache: off
> > > > > > >> performance.stat-prefetch: off
> > > > > > >> features.shard: on
> > > > > > >> features.shard-block-size: 256MB
> > > > > > >> cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51%
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks for your help
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Kevin Lemonnier
> > > > > > >> PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > >> Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > >> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
> > > > brièveté.
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kevin Lemonnier
> > > > PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Lemonnier
> > PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
--
Kevin Lemonnier
PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160425/f4c21695/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list