[Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.2 locking up issues

Daniel Jordan Bambach dan at lateral.net
Thu Jun 18 12:18:06 UTC 2009


Well one of the servers just locked up again (completely).

All accesses were occurring on the other machine at the time, We had a  
moment when a directory on the still running server went to 'Device or  
Resource Busy', I restartedt Gluster on that machine to clear the  
issue, then noticed the second had died (not sure if it happened at  
the same time or not)

I'm trying to update the dump_caches value to 3, but it isn't letting  
me for some reason (permission denied as root ?)

Will adding DEBUG to the glusterfs commandline give me more  
information across the whole process rather than the trace (below)  
which isnt giving anything away?


[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:1245:trace_lookup] trace: 162: (loc  
{path=/www/site/rebuild2008/faber, ino=0})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:513:trace_lookup_cbk] trace: 162:  
(op_ret=0, ino=0, *buf {st_dev=64768, st_ino=37883182, st_mode=40775,  
st_nlink=24, st_uid=504, st_gid=501, st_rdev=0, st_size=4096,  
st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=16})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:1245:trace_lookup] trace: 163: (loc  
{path=/www/site/rebuild2008/faber/site-media, ino=0})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:513:trace_lookup_cbk] trace: 163:  
(op_ret=0, ino=0, *buf {st_dev=64768, st_ino=19238048, st_mode=40777,  
st_nlink=21, st_uid=504, st_gid=501, st_rdev=0, st_size=4096,  
st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=16})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:1245:trace_lookup] trace: 164: (loc  
{path=/www/site/rebuild2008/faber/site-media/onix-images, ino=0})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:513:trace_lookup_cbk] trace: 164:  
(op_ret=0, ino=0, *buf {st_dev=64768, st_ino=37884374, st_mode=40777,  
st_nlink=4, st_uid=504, st_gid=501, st_rdev=0, st_size=114688,  
st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=240})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:1245:trace_lookup] trace: 165: (loc  
{path=/www/site/rebuild2008/faber/site-media/onix-images/thumbs, ino=0})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:513:trace_lookup_cbk] trace: 165:  
(op_ret=0, ino=0, *buf {st_dev=64768, st_ino=19238105, st_mode=40777,  
st_nlink=3, st_uid=504, st_gid=501, st_rdev=0, st_size=479232,  
st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=952})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:1245:trace_lookup] trace: 166: (loc  
{path=/www/site/rebuild2008/faber/site-media/onix-images/thumbs/ 
185_jpg_130x400_q85.jpg, ino=0})
[2009-06-18 12:42:08] N [trace.c:513:trace_lookup_cbk] trace: 166:  
(op_ret=0, ino=0, *buf {st_dev=64768, st_ino=7089866, st_mode=100644,  
st_nlink=1, st_uid=504, st_gid=501, st_rdev=0, st_size=10919,  
st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=32})
---ends--


On 18 Jun 2009, at 11:53, Daniel Jordan Bambach wrote:

> Willdo, though I recently added in those lines to help be explicit  
> about behaviour (I had no options set before at all, leaving it to  
> the default of 16 threads). I will remove and specify the default of  
> 16 to see if that helps.
>
> Im adding:
>
> volume trace
>  type debug/trace
>  subvolumes cache
> end-volume
>
> to both sides now as well, so next time (if any) it locks up perhaps  
> there will be some more info.
>
> Thanks Shehjar
>
>
> On 18 Jun 2009, at 11:26, Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
>
>> Daniel Jordan Bambach wrote:
>>> I'm experiencing various locking up issues ranging from Gluster  
>>> locking up ( 'ls'ing the mount hangs ), to the whole machine  
>>> locking up under load.
>>> My current config is below (two servers, afring)
>>> I would love to be able to get to the bottom of this, because it  
>>> seems very strange that we should see erratic behaviour on such a  
>>> simple setup.
>>> There is approx 12Gb of files, and to stress test (and heal) i run  
>>> ls -alR on the mount. This will run for a while and eventually  
>>> lock up Gluster, and occasionally the machine. I have found that  
>>> in some cases killing Gluster and re-mounting does not solve the  
>>> problem (in that perhaps both servers have entered a locked state  
>>> in some way).
>>> Im finding it very hard to collect and debug information of any  
>>> use, as there is no crashlog, no errors in the volume log.
>>> Can anyone suggest what I migth be able to do to extract more  
>>> information as to what is occuring at lock-up time?
>>> volume posix
>>> type storage/posix
>>> option directory /home/export
>>> end-volume
>>> volume locks
>>> type features/locks
>>> subvolumes posix
>>> end-volume
>>> volume brick
>>> type performance/io-threads
>>> subvolumes locks
>>> option autoscaling on
>>> option min-threads 8
>>> option max-threads 32
>>> end-volume
>> I see that the max-threads will never exceed 32 which is
>> a reasonable valueand should work fine in most cases but considering
>> some of the other reports we've been getting, could you please try  
>> again
>> but without the autoscaling turned on?
>>
>> It is off by default, so you can simply set the number of threads
>> you need by:
>>
>> option thread-count <COUNT>
>>
>> ...instead of the three "option" lines above.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Shehjar
>>
>>
>>> volume server
>>> type protocol/server
>>> option transport-type tcp
>>> option auth.addr.brick.allow *
>>> subvolumes brick
>>> end-volume
>>> volume latsrv2
>>> type protocol/client
>>> option transport-type tcp
>>> option remote-host latsrv2
>>> option remote-subvolume brick
>>> end-volume
>>> volume afr
>>> type cluster/replicate
>>> subvolumes brick latsrv2
>>> option read-subvolume brick
>>> end-volume
>>> volume writebehind
>>> type performance/write-behind
>>> option cache-size 2MB
>>> subvolumes afr
>>> end-volume
>>> volume cache
>>> type performance/io-cache
>>> option cache-size 32MB
>>> option priority *.pyc:4,*.html:3,*.php:2,*:1
>>> option cache-timeout 5
>>> subvolumes writebehind
>>> end-volume
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>





More information about the Gluster-users mailing list