[Gluster-infra] Zuul?

[Kaushal M]

I'd brought up Zuul a long while back. The opinion then was that,
while a gatekeeper is nice, we didn't want to maintain anymore infra
over what we had at the time. We tried to make Jenkins itself do the
work, which hasn't succeeded as well as we hoped.

With you being dedicated to maintain the infra, this will be a nice
time to revisit/investigate Zuul again.






On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've had master breaking twice in this week because we of when we run
> regressions and how we merge. I think it's time we officially thought of moving
> regressions as a gate controlld by Zuul. And Zuul will do the merge onto
> the correct branch.
>
> This is me throwing the idea about to hear any negative thoughts, before I do
> further investigation. What does everyone think about this?
>
> Note: I've purposefully not CC'd gluster-devel here because I'd rather go to
> the full developer team with a proper plan.
>
> --
> nigelb
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-infra mailing list
> Gluster-infra at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra