[Gluster-infra] Move of the ci.gluster.org server from one location to another location

[Michael Scherer]

Le lundi 08 août 2016 à 15:11 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le mercredi 03 août 2016 à 14:43 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 28 juillet 2016 à 10:21 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:21:33AM -0400, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
> > > > > On 07/27/2016 05:18 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From the latest updates on the cage list, it looks like we're tracking
> > > > > > for these moves/downtime for August 8-9? That'll be Monday-Tuesday.
> > > > > > Any complaints about that schedule?
> > > > >
> > > > > 3.8.x releases are scheduled for the 10th of each month. In yesterday's
> > > > > Community meeting Niels said that 3.8.2 is planned to be released on
> > > > > schedule.
> > > > >
> > > > > If this goes as planned then it shouldn't be a problem, right?
> > > >
> > > > We just need to make sure that all patches for 3.8.2 have been tested in
> > > > the CI before the move. It shortens the development cycle a few days,
> > > > and it would have been nice to know a little more in advance and
> > > > mentioned in the community meeting.
> > > >
> > > > I do not think there are any critical patches for the release, so I do
> > > > not expect any problems with the outage either. (Although it really
> > > > isn't nice to treat 3.8 releases as guinea pig for infrastructure
> > > > changes.)
> > > >
> > > > Niels
> > > >
> > > > I brought this up to the community cage group this morning, and we'll look
> > > to move the VMs after the 3.8.2 release.
> > > I'll let Michael put in more details around exact timing.
> > 
> > So we still do not have the exact timing, that's waiting on IT to
> > configure the network port (and then I have to copy data, and configure
> > the server for new network, and admin cards, and various stuff). 
> 
> So After coming back from weekend, and dealing with my backlog of mail
> and expenses, I just received a notification that IT did moved the
> server (on friday evening) and it does even answer to ping on the admin
> interface. So I will configure it for internet access later today or
> tomorow (depending on my capacity to read all mails and doing meetings),
> and will then plan to the test move once I am confident the server is
> ok.
> 

So, news about the server.

I did see there was some weird lvm corruption (that I didn't
investigate), but couldn't find the exact fix. Turn out that this was
just removing extranous PV from the VG and that's it. However, since we
are speaking of moving production workload on it, I will need to
reformat it to use hardware raid, and so doing that tonight. 

Then i will start to test the copy of VM once that part is done.


-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/attachments/20160817/71dba672/attachment.sig>