<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:08 AM Yaniv Kaul <<a href="mailto:ykaul@redhat.com">ykaul@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Personally, I would like to see CentOS 9 Stream support soon.</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Y.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div> glusterfs-10.1 (and 10.0) were built for Stream 9[1][2][3]. And are even tagged for release.</div><div><br></div><div>glusterfs-9.5 was too[1][4]</div><div><br></div><div>Maybe what's missing are the centos-release-gluster{9,10} packages in CentOS-Extras? Those are the convenient way to get gluster packages for Stream 9 but it is possible to get them without the centos-release-* packages.</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5</a></div><div>[2] <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35960">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35960</a></div><div>[3] <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36893">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36893</a></div><div>[4] <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36987">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36987</a></div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Kaleb</div></div></div></div>