<div dir="ltr">Thank you for the clarification. <br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:12 PM RAFI KC &lt;<a href="mailto:rkavunga@redhat.com">rkavunga@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>If that is the case, then we don&#39;t need to do anything from
      snapshot point of view.</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Regards</p>
    <p>Rafi KC<br>
    </p>
    <div class="gmail-m_3288061222970906317moz-cite-prefix">On 9/23/19 6:09 PM, Shwetha Acharya
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">We are thinking of eliminating path from index
        file, instead of replacing it. We need to further see if it is
        feasible to do so. I am looking into it.  <a class="gmail_plusreply" id="gmail-m_3288061222970906317plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:avishwan@redhat.com" target="_blank">@Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna
          Murthy</a> <a class="gmail_plusreply" id="gmail-m_3288061222970906317plusReplyChip-1" href="mailto:khiremat@redhat.com" target="_blank">@Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar</a>  Any
        pointers on this?<br>
        <br>
        Regards,
        <div>Shwetha</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:53
          PM RAFI KC &lt;<a href="mailto:rkavunga@redhat.com" target="_blank">rkavunga@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote">
          <div>
            <p><br>
            </p>
            <div class="gmail-m_3288061222970906317gmail-m_-6783142470728951064moz-cite-prefix">On
              9/23/19 4:13 PM, Shwetha Acharya wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">Hi All,<br>
                I am planning to work on <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238699" target="_blank">this</a> bugzilla
                issue. <br>
                Here, when we restore the snapshots, and start the
                geo-replication session, we see that the geo-replication
                goes faulty. It is mainly because, the brick path of
                original session and the session after snapshot restore
                will be different. There is a proposed work around for
                this issue, according to which we replace the old brick
                path with new brick path inside the index file
                HTIME.xxxxxxxxxx, which basically solves the issue.<br>
                <br>
                I have some doubts regarding the same.<br>
                We are going with the work around from a long time. Are
                there any limitations stopping us from implementing
                solution for this, which I am currently unaware of?  <br>
                Is it important to have paths inside index file? Can we
                eliminate the paths inside them?<br>
                Is there any concerns from snapshot side?<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <p>Can you please explain how we are planning to replace the
              path in the index file. Did we finalized the method? The
              problem here is that any time consuming operation within
              the glusterd transaction could be a difficult.</p>
            <p>Rafi</p>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">Are there any other general concerns
                regarding the same?<br>
                <br>
                Regards,<br>
                Shwetha<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

</blockquote></div>