<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kaleb Keithley <<a href="mailto:kkeithle@redhat.com">kkeithle@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <<a href="mailto:atumball@redhat.com" target="_blank">atumball@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>We recently noticed that in one of the package update on builder (ie, centos7.x machines), python3.6 got installed as a dependency. So, yes, it is possible to have python3 in centos7 now.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>EPEL updated from python34 to python36 recently, but C7 doesn't have python3 in the base. I don't think we've ever used EPEL packages for building.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And GlusterFS-5 isn't python3 ready.</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>Correction: GlusterFS-5 is mostly or completely python3 ready.
FWIW, python33 is available on both RHEL7 and CentOS7 from the Software
Collection Library (SCL), and python34 and now python36 are available
from EPEL.</div><div><br></div><div>But packages built for the CentOS
Storage SIG have never used the SCL or EPEL (EPEL not allowed) and the
shebangs in the .py files are converted from /usr/bin/python3 to
/usr/bin/python2 during the rpmbuild %prep stage. All the python
dependencies for the packages remain the python2 flavors. AFAIK the
centos-regression machines ought to be building the same way.</div> </div><div>--</div><div><br></div><div>Kaleb<br></div></div></div>