<div dir="ltr">What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Niels de Vos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ndevos@redhat.com" target="_blank">ndevos@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:03:02PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:<br>
> Hi Team,<br>
><br>
> I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have<br>
> noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL) CPU load is<br>
> low, but when we apply the ACL on gluster volume which internally uses Fuse<br>
> ACL, CPU load gets increase about 6x times.<br>
><br>
> Could you please let me know is this expected or we can do some other<br>
> configuration to reduce this type of overhead on gluster volume with ACLs.<br>
><br>
> For more clarification we are using kernel NFS for exporting the gluster<br>
> volume.<br>
<br>
</span>Exporting Gluster volumes over FUSE and kernel NFS is not something we<br>
suggest and test. There are (or at least were) certain limitations in<br>
FUSE that prevented good support for this.<br>
<br>
Please use NFS-Ganesha instead, that is the NFS server we actively<br>
develop with. Gluster/NFS is still available too, but is only receiving<br>
the occasional fixes and is only suggested for legacy users that did not<br>
move to NFS-Ganesha yet.<br>
<br>
HTH,<br>
Niels<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><br><br><br><br>Regards<br>
Abhishek Paliwal<br>
</div></div>
</div>