<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 May 2017 at 06:56, Shyam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:srangana@redhat.com" target="_blank">srangana@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
Backport status:<br>
The following patches are available in release-3.10 but not in release-3.11,<br>
- <a href="https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17197/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.gluster.org/#/c<wbr>/17197/</a> (@nithya request the backport)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Apologies. Patch available at <a href="https://review.gluster.org/17373">https://review.gluster.org/17373</a></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
- <a href="https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17175/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.gluster.org/#/c<wbr>/17175/</a> (@hari request the backport)<br>
<br>
Test case status (from fstat):<br>
<br>
Following test case was marked bad in master, but not in 3.11 and has caused a few aborted runs, I have backported the change, so we should be good in the future,<br>
- tests/features/lock_revocation<wbr>.t (backport: <a href="https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17360/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.gluster.org/#/c<wbr>/17360/</a> )<br>
<br>
Request that any test case when marked bad in master, be looked at for the prior release (in this case 3.11) so that spurious regression failures are avoided in that branch as well.<br>
<br>
Following test cases failed 1 time in the last 3 weeks, so nothing critical, but reporting it here nevertheless,<br>
- ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-se<wbr>lf-heal.t<br>
- ./tests/basic/tier/legacy-many<wbr>.t<br>
- ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1345<wbr>727-bricks-stop-on-no-quorum-<wbr>validation.t<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Shyam<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>