[Gluster-devel] Invitation: Re: Question on merging zfs snapshot supp... @ Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm - 3:30pm (IST) (sriram at marirs.net.in)
Avra Sengupta
asengupt at redhat.com
Thu Jan 12 07:10:16 UTC 2017
Works fine for us Sriram. Friday 2-3 pm.
Regards,
Avra
On 01/12/2017 11:54 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> Hi Avra,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, could we have the meeting tomorrow? 2-3 pm?
>
> Sriram
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We can have a discussion tomorrow i.e 12th January from 3pm to 4 pm.
>> Does that time work for you?
>>
>> Meeting Link : https://bluejeans.com/u/asengupt/
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbluejeans.com%2Fu%2Fasengupt%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHgp0xCwA9DqgdbAc9s2OxthUEHRA>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Avra
>>
>> On 01/10/2017 09:35 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>>> Hello Rajesh, Avra,
>>>
>>> Could we have a discussion on the below? This week sometime?
>>>
>>> Sriram
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 04:56 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>>> Sure, will setup it from next week onward.
>>>> -Rajesh
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:38 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rajesh,
>>>>
>>>> Right now bi-weekly should be ok, with progress we could
>>>> decide. I'll continue to rework the initial patch set and post
>>>> it for review. We'll take it from there, is that ok with you?
>>>>
>>>> Sriram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 03:32 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:19 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the below request ok with you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016, at 10:00 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Avra/Rajesh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In continuation to the discussion we'd yesterday, I'd be
>>>>>> working on the change we'd initiated sometime back for
>>>>>> pluggable FS specific snapshot implementation. We'd be
>>>>>> moving our gluster deployements to "master" (stable) once
>>>>>> this feature goes in. Since, glusterd2.0 release is
>>>>>> scheduled release next year, I'd be happy if some of the
>>>>>> work done here is re-usable to glusterd2.0 as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know, if this is ok. Like Rajesh mentioned in the
>>>>>> call, could we've a weekly meeting for the same feature?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>> I was on vacation so could not reply to your mail.
>>>>> I am OK with having a regular sync-up on this issue. Let's
>>>>> take this to conclusion.
>>>>> Do we need a weekly meeting or bi-weekly meeting is fine?
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Rajesh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, at 03:55 PM, asengupt at redhat.com
>>>>>> <mailto:asengupt at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more details »
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs
>>>>>>> snapshot support into the mainline glusterfs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you please join the hangout, so that we can
>>>>>>> discuss snapshot plugabbility. Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meeting Link: https://bluejeans.com/u/asengupt/
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbluejeans.com%2Fu%2Fasengupt%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHgp0xCwA9DqgdbAc9s2OxthUEHRA>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Avra
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/19/2016 01:38 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote: > Hi Avra, > >
>>>>>>> Could you help on the below request? May I abandon the
>>>>>>> previous submitted patches, and could we consider the
>>>>>>> latest one? > > Sriram > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at
>>>>>>> 12:57 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote: >> Hi Avra, >> >>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the reply, >> >> But the problem I see here
>>>>>>> is the previous patch set sent would'nt compile
>>>>>>> individually. So, I merged the changes into a single
>>>>>>> patch , which i'd posted today. Is it ok to drop all the
>>>>>>> previous posted patches and consider from the new one?
>>>>>>> Please suggest. >> >> Sriram >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 15,
>>>>>>> 2016, at 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>>> >>> >>> I have already provided comments on the new
>>>>>>> patch. It seems this new patch while addressing merge
>>>>>>> cloflicts, has undone some previous patches. I suggest
>>>>>>> you send this patch on top of the previous
>>>>>>> patchset(http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/1
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F1&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNE4gL3TlKKImxMOU_yOKoCFnP27BA>)
>>>>>>> instead of creating a new one. This will allow you to
>>>>>>> view the diff between the new version and the previous
>>>>>>> version, and will give u an idea if the diff is
>>>>>>> something that you added in the patch or got added as
>>>>>>> part of merge conflict. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Avra >>>
>>>>>>> >>> On 12/15/2016 12:09 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote: >>>> Hi Avra, >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> I've update the patch according to the comments
>>>>>>> below. And created a single patch which does the initial
>>>>>>> modularization. Fixed the tab->space issue as well. I've
>>>>>>> raised a new review request for the same bug ID here:
>>>>>>> >>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16138/
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F16138%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGST3yFW0o5r4X5DiUXR0GOvgUUUQ>
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Added, Rajesh and You as the reviewers, let me
>>>>>>> know if I need to do anything else. >>>> >>>> Could you
>>>>>>> have a look and let me know? >>>> >>>> (Sorry for the
>>>>>>> delay in creating this) >>>> >>>> Sriram >>>> >>>> On
>>>>>>> Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>> Hi Sriram, >>>>> >>>>> The point I was trying to
>>>>>>> make is, that we want that each patch should compile by
>>>>>>> itself, and pass regression. So for that to happen, we
>>>>>>> need to consolidate these patches(the first three) into
>>>>>>> one patch, and have the necessary make file changes into
>>>>>>> that patch too. >>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEgad6GCmPU7P8S1wod8fgs-vOJLw>
>>>>>>> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15555/
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15555%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG6W-AdS5f66QUqkj1ywoxXGes7NQ>
>>>>>>> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15556/
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15556%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG_1vMwB5YePfBQSG0lhYUTxoAM3w>
>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That will give us one single patch, that
>>>>>>> contains the changes of having the current code moved
>>>>>>> into separate files, and it should get compiled on it's
>>>>>>> own, and should pass regression. Also, we use spaces,
>>>>>>> and not tabs in the code. So we will need to get those
>>>>>>> changed too. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Avra
>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/12/2016 10:46 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you let me know on the below
>>>>>>> request? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sriram >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On
>>>>>>> Tue, Oct 4, 2016, at 11:16 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked the comment, the series of
>>>>>>> patches, (There are nine patches) for which I've posted
>>>>>>> for a review below. They've all the necessary makefiles
>>>>>>> to compile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you want me to
>>>>>>> consolidate all'em and post them as a single patch? (I
>>>>>>> thought that would be a little confusing, since it'd
>>>>>>> changes with different intentions). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, at
>>>>>>> 03:54 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I posted a comment into the first
>>>>>>> patch. It doesn't compile by itself. We need to update
>>>>>>> the respective makefiles to be able to compile it. Then
>>>>>>> we can introduce the tabular structure in the same patch
>>>>>>> to have the framework set for the zfs snapshots. Thanks.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Avra >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 09/30/2016 10:24 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>> <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Could you have a look into the below
>>>>>>> request? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 04:10 PM,
>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>
>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have
>>>>>>> submitted the patches for Modularizing snapshot,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is the patch set: >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15554
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15554&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHk_z5vu62VRSnxCltQhL-8H7w5-w>
>>>>>>> This patch follows the discussion from the gluster-devel
>>>>>>> mail chain of, ... >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15555
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15555&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFtjkyj_R7NYpRk-tnP3ol4tpthYQ>
>>>>>>> Referring to bugID:1377437, Modularizing snapshot for
>>>>>>> plugin based modules. >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15556
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15556&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEi_WhUMxIIYJe2LZ6b43yFJtO9YA>
>>>>>>> - This is third patch in the series for the bug=1377437
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15557
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15557&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNH7GHU6yX6hZrloWQOovx3sRni2pQ>
>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch4]: Refering to the bug ID,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15558
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15558&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEdvqKP6ZkiNzBS6PG0V4yXPPe2Mg>
>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch5]: Refering to the bug ID,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15559
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15559&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEapBOtXvqFtGb5va2ZzWgtD2BFIQ>
>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch6]: Refering to the bug ID,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15560
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15560&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHs2bZyIlC78giiYEi-4q2-PA6IMw>
>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch7]: Refering to the bug ID. * This
>>>>>>> patch has some minor ... >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15561
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15561&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGFuuYDikEfaccqIiQ_Bo-amMC1Jw>
>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch8]: Refering to the bug ID, this
>>>>>>> commit has minor fixes ... >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15562
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15562&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGH9R8bTbHfGsVvL9R-1m41gGHGRg>
>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch9]: Refering to the bug ID, - Minor
>>>>>>> header file ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Primarily, focused
>>>>>>> on moving lvm based implementation into plugins. Have
>>>>>>> spread the commits across nine patches, some of them are
>>>>>>> minors, except a couple of ones which does the real
>>>>>>> work. Others are minors. Followed this method since, it
>>>>>>> would be easy for a review (accept/reject). Let me know
>>>>>>> if there is something off the methods followed with
>>>>>>> gluster devel. Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, at 10:58 PM,
>>>>>>> Avra Sengupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram, >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a bug for this
>>>>>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA>).
>>>>>>> The plan is that for the first patch as mentioned below,
>>>>>>> let's not meddle with the zfs code at all. What we are
>>>>>>> looking at is segregating the lvm based code as is
>>>>>>> today, from the management infrastructure (which is
>>>>>>> addressed in your patch), and creating a table based
>>>>>>> pluggable infra(refer to gd_svc_cli_actors[] in
>>>>>>> xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-handler.c and other
>>>>>>> similar tables in gluster code base to get a
>>>>>>> understanding of what I am conveying), which can be used
>>>>>>> to call this code and still achieve the same results as
>>>>>>> we do today. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once this code is
>>>>>>> merged, we can use the same infra to start pushing in
>>>>>>> the zfs code (rest of your current patch). Please let me
>>>>>>> know if you have further queries regarding this. Thanks.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Avra
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 09/19/2016 07:52 PM,
>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>
>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have a bug id for this changes? Or may I raise a
>>>>>>> new one? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 11:37
>>>>>>> AM, sriram at marirs.net.in <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>
>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Avra, >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll send this patch to gluster master in
>>>>>>> a while. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep
>>>>>>> 14, 2016, at 03:08 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay in response. I started going through
>>>>>>> the commits in the github repo. I finished going through
>>>>>>> the first commit, where you create a plugin structure
>>>>>>> and move code. Following is the commit link:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/sriramster/glusterfs/commit/7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsriramster%2Fglusterfs%2Fcommit%2F7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEo6QDZCzyg9yMQ4mqkY0zM6Z9krg>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FIrst of all, the overall
>>>>>>> approach of using plugins, and maintaining plugins that
>>>>>>> is used in the patch is in sync with what we had
>>>>>>> discussed. There are some gaps though, like in the zfs
>>>>>>> functions the snap brick is mounted without updating
>>>>>>> labels, and in restore you perform a zfs rollback, which
>>>>>>> significantly changes the behavior between how a lvm
>>>>>>> based snapshot and a zfs based snapshot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But before we get into these details, I
>>>>>>> would request you to kindly send this particular patch
>>>>>>> to the g
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /When/
>>>>>>> Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm – 3:30pm India Standard Time
>>>>>>> /Calendar/
>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>
>>>>>>> /Who/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>> asengupt at redhat.com <mailto:asengupt at redhat.com>- organizer
>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>> rjoseph at redhat.com <mailto:rjoseph at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>> ram at fractalio.com <mailto:ram at fractalio.com>
>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>> gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Going? *Yes
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=1&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>-
>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=3&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMT%21%0A%20IwM2VlZmMx%0AZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>-
>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=2&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>*
>>>>>>> more options »
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Invitation from Google Calendar
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are receiving this courtesy email at the account
>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in <mailto:sriram at marirs.net.in>
>>>>>>> because you are an attendee of this event.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline
>>>>>>> this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google
>>>>>>> account at https://www.google.com/calendar/
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/calendar/> and control your
>>>>>>> notification settings for your entire calendar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to
>>>>>>> modify your RSVP response. Learn More
>>>>>>> <https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Email had 2 attachments:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> |Attachment1.3|
>>>>>>> 10k (text/calendar)
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> |invite.ics|
>>>>>>> 14k (application/ics)
>>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>> <http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170112/362c96e9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list