[Gluster-devel] Change in glusterfs[master]: tests: fix bug-860663.t

Joseph Fernandes josferna at redhat.com
Mon Feb 29 10:38:20 UTC 2016


Oops the authors are not actively contributing to gluster now.

Sorry about that.

~Joe

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Fernandes" <josferna at redhat.com>
> To: jdarcy at redhat.com
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:44:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Change in glusterfs[master]: tests: fix	bug-860663.t
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> I would suggest add the author of this script to the review panel.
> 
> Regards,
> Joe
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Darcy (Code Review)" <review at dev.gluster.org>
> > To: "Joseph Fernandes" <josferna at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:42:45 PM
> > Subject: Change in glusterfs[master]: tests: fix bug-860663.t
> > 
> > Hello Joseph Fernandes,
> > 
> > I'd like you to do a code review.  Please visit
> > 
> >     http://review.gluster.org/13544
> > 
> > to review the following change.
> > 
> > Change subject: tests: fix bug-860663.t
> > ......................................................................
> > 
> > tests: fix bug-860663.t
> > 
> > Three changes:
> > 
> >  * Removed the second round of file creation, which wasn't really
> >    testing anything useful and was causing spurious failures.  Under the
> >    conditions we've set up, the rational expectation would be for the
> >    file-creation helper program to succeed, but the test expected it to
> >    fail.
> > 
> >  * Removed Yet Another Unnecessary Sleep.
> > 
> >  * Reduced the number of files from 10K to 1K.  That's more than
> >    sufficient to test what we're trying to test, and saves significant
> >    time.
> > 
> > There's still a bit of a mystery about how this test *ever* passed.  If
> > I want mystery I'll read a detective novel.  The more important thing is
> > that the line in question was irrelevant to the purpose of the test
> > (which had to do with not allowing a fix-layout while bricks were down)
> > and was far too heavyweight to be included as a "while we're here might
> > as well" kind of addition.
> > 
> > Change-Id: If1c623853745ab42ce7d058d1009bbe1dcc1e985
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > M tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> >   git pull ssh://git.gluster.org/glusterfs refs/changes/44/13544/1
> > --
> > To view, visit http://review.gluster.org/13544
> > To unsubscribe, visit http://review.gluster.org/settings
> > 
> > Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
> > Gerrit-Change-Id: If1c623853745ab42ce7d058d1009bbe1dcc1e985
> > Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
> > Gerrit-Project: glusterfs
> > Gerrit-Branch: master
> > Gerrit-Owner: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com>
> > Gerrit-Reviewer: Joseph Fernandes <josferna at redhat.com>
> > Gerrit-Reviewer: N Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com>
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list