[Gluster-devel] 1st results: gcov/lcov code coverage of glusterfs

[Vijay Bellur]

On 05/17/2013 02:01 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Im not quite sure what im seeing here, but ...
>
> the prove test './tests/basic/posixonly.t' should test, well, posix ;).
>
> and yet the gcov report says its not being hit:
> http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/usr/local/glusterfs/lib/glusterfs/3git/xlator/storage/posix.c.gcov.html
>
> Does anyone who has a deeper understanding of both the codebase and
> the test know if that test should indeed hit that file ? If so, the
> report is wrong. And if not, the test may need to be changed.
>

The test should indeed hit posix.c. Wouldn't this be indicative of what 
lines were covered by this test:

http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c.gcov.html

Thanks,
Vijay