[Cinder.glusterfs.ci] [Third-party-announce] Cinder-GlusterFS CI job - recent failures

[John Griffith]

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Deepak C Shetty <deepakcs at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi CI'ers :)
>     Just wanted to send a quick update on the glusterfs CI job
> (check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs-nv) currently failing on most patches,
> is due to the recently enabled test_volume_boot_pattern which is failing
> for glusterfs backend.
>
>    I have opened LP bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1441050 to
> track the issue.
> Bharat (in CC) is actively working on it.
>
>   I would like to know if we continue with the status-quo or disable this
> testcase for glusterfs until this bug is fixed ?
>
> thanx,
> deepak
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Third-party-announce mailing list
> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>
Seems the trend for Ceph is to add a skip [1].  Personally I'd like to see
some more analysis before just skipping, even better actually see the
problem fixed.  For the record, I'm not a fan of immediately
skipping/disabling for a single backend.  We've been pretty hard on Vendors
the last few weeks that weren't running all of the same tests as the
reference implementation.  But in the case of Ceph and now Gluster it seems
we have "different" standards.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not opposed to this, and I gave my +1 to the Ceph
patch (and would give it to the Gluster patch with more info).  I'm just
saying however that we need to get some consistency here and treat
everybody fairly.  I spent "A LOT" of time this release cycle making sure
my device and the LVM device worked properly, significantly more on LVM.

I proposed a temporary skip for LVM once and it was adamantly rejected.  I
then proposed a sleep in Nova for the LVM driver, again rejected.  The
response has been "The issue needs to be fixed or at least completely
understood".  Same holds true here in my opinion.

Thanks,
John

[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170903/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/cinder.glusterfs.ci/attachments/20150407/2e8e4d81/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Third-party-announce mailing list
Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce