[Bugs] [Bug 1786276] New: [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in schedule_georep.py.in isn't clear.
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 24 07:28:36 UTC 2019
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786276
Bug ID: 1786276
Summary: [geo-rep] Help for positional argument SLAVE in
schedule_georep.py.in isn't clear.
Product: GlusterFS
Version: mainline
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: geo-replication
Severity: low
Priority: low
Assignee: kiyer at redhat.com
Reporter: kiyer at redhat.com
CC: bugs at gluster.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Community
Description of problem:
SLAVE positional argument doesn't provide a clear picture of what it is when
compared to mastervol and slavevol in schedule_georep.py.in. It would be better
if we change it to something like "Slave hostame (<username>@SLAVEHOST or
SLAVEHOST)"
Present:
----------
positional arguments:
mastervol Master Volume Name
SLAVE SLAVEHOST or root at SLAVEHOST or user at SLAVEHOST
slavevol Slave Volume Name
Suggested:
-----------
positional arguments:
mastervol Master Volume Name
SLAVE Slave hostname (<username>@SLAVEHOST or SLAVEHOST)
slavevol Slave Volume Name
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Whatever it the latest
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Bugs
mailing list